Cameroon Becomes Latest Nation to Resist UN CEDAW Committee on Abortion

by Samantha Singson
January 15, 2009

New York, NY (LifeNews.com) -- The committee that monitors state compliance with the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) will begin a new session in Geneva next week, but even prior to the meeting six of the eight states who will be reviewed have already been questioned on abortion.

In a stinging written response to the CEDAW committee’s advance questions, Cameroon fired back that “abortion is murder.”

CEDAW does not mention abortion, but the committee has courted controversy for years by pressuring over 65 countries to liberalize their abortion laws.

In a written communication to the Cameroon government, the CEDAW committee asked the government to account for how they have implemented CEDAW’s previous recommendations to “review the abortion law and increase access to, and availability of, contraception.”

The government of Cameroon provided a lengthy written answer to the question and repudiated the tendency to “elevate” abortion to “the rank of a right and dignity.” Cameroon continued that abortion “is portrayed as a freedom without mentioning that the mother exercises this freedom to the detriment of the child’s.”

The Cameroon response lists the risks associated with abortion, including death, intestinal aspiration, hemorrhaging, infection, sterility, ectopic pregnancy, future miscarriage, perforation of the uterus and distress. Cameroon warned that new ideologies and scientific and technical progress “must not lead to an erosion in basic values.”

Cameroon emphasized the traditional African philosophy that “recognizes the permanent bond that links societies and families to their ancestors” and how children are a “bridge between generations past and present, while representing future prospects for communities.”

Therefore, any abortion performed for any reason “other than to save the life of the mother or child, impedes the expression of this vital social dynamic.”

Cameroon also reminded the CEDAW committee of an aspect it feels is overlooked – “the tremendous joy that the possibility of having a child brings to women, as well as to men and families.”

Cameroon asks the members of the committee to “Think for a moment of the anguish felt by the many couples who do not have children; think of the thousands of women and men who, in spite of their comfortable material existence, desperately want a child, even if it means adopting just one child.”

While the recommendations of the CEDAW committee are non-binding, abortion activists have brought litigation in various countries citing human rights treaty bodies, like the CEDAW Committee, in challenging laws against abortion. Such arguments helped convince the Colombian constitutional court to liberalize that country’s restrictions on the practice.

CEDAW critics will be watching the next session closely to monitor the performance of several newly elected committee members such as Violet Tsisiga Awori of Kenya and Barbara Evelyn Bailey of Jamaica, who were high-ranking members of non-government organizations that advocated for abortion rights in their respective regions.

Along with Cameroon, the CEDAW Committee will also be reviewing the country reports of Armenia, Dominica, Germany, Guatemala, Haiti, Libya and Rwanda.

(LifeNews.com Note: Samantha Singson writes for the Catholic Family and Human Rights Institute. This article originally appeared in the pro-life group's Friday Fax publication.)

*****************
Why I am Pro-Life: New Canadian Caucus Leader Expands on Abortion Opposition
by Rod Bruinooge
I think it is essential for a society to value its unborn citizens. The importance we give our offspring pre-birth affects the importance we place on them post-birth. In Canada in 2008, our citizens have no legal value while in the wombs of their mothers. We are completely alone in the world in this regard. Most Canadians would agree that you should not be able to remove your kidney and sell it on eBay to the highest bidder. Although it's your body and your kidney, this would not only be a poor bioethical choice, but it is in fact illegal under our laws. Most Canadians would also agree that an unborn child in the ninth month of gestation, moments away from delivery, should not be eligible for an elective abortion. However, regardless of the fact that this would be an extremely poor bioethical choice, it is in fact legal. As such, Canada has far greater protections for human kidneys than we do for human fetuses. By assigning no legal worth to our unborn children, we set the stage for a society that continues to lose out on natural community growth. The study of demographics in our country speaks clearly on this topic, and the numbers are stark. Is there a correlation between our nation's collapsing birth rate and our legal and social devaluation of the unborn? Of course there is.


Pregnant British Teen, Rape Victim, Glad She Didn’t Have Abortion

London, England (LifeNews.com) -- A British teenager who was a victim of rape recently shared her story with the London Daily Mail about how she is glad she didn’t have an abortion and loves her daughter despite her father’s crime. Elizabeth Cameron says she’s not sure what she will tell her daughter when she is old enough to understand the story behind her birth. “When new people ask, I say I have nothing to do with him - which is true,” she says. “But I'm not sure yet what I will tell Phoebe herself when she is old enough to ask. Hopefully, one day, I will get married, and then Phoebe will have a father and it won't be such an issue.” That Phoebe exists at all almost defies belief. Practically everyone who knew exactly how Elizabeth had fallen pregnant - doctors, siblings, even her own father - urged her to have an abortion as soon as possible. The only person who pleaded with her to at least consider having the child was her mother, Sarah. “Everyone, save for mum, thought I should have an abortion,” she says. “My dad even made an appointment at the clinic, and they showed me the little blob on the scan, I presume, to convince me that it was just a mass of cells and the whole thing would be over quickly. But I couldn't go through with it. At school, my friends - most of whom didn't even know about the rape - couldn't understand why anyone my age would want to have a baby rather than an abortion.” Yet Elizabeth grew to love her daughter. “It was surprisingly easy to love her as she grew inside me, but I have to admit I was scared my feelings would change when I saw her.”

Argentina Judge Rejects Abortion for 12 Year-Old Girl on Mental Health Grounds

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
September 29, 2008

Buenos Aires, Argentina (LifeNews.com) -- Although a judge in Australia has allowed an abortion for a 12-year-old girl, another one in Argentina has denied the request and cited mental health ground for doing so.

The Hispanic girl was impregnated through rape but the judge ruled her mother can't make her have an abortion after hearing evidence that the abortion could cause her mental health problems.

Justice Germán Ferrer noted that expert witnesses testified that "after analyzing the whole situation, above all the psychological and social aspects of the child, [the experts] came to the conclusion that today the interruption of the pregnancy could produce a personality disturbance in the child that could result in irreversible psychiatric pathologies such as psychosis.”

The Elliot Institute says it is not surprised the judge noted the psychological issues involved.

“Indeed, evidence suggests that, in addition to causing the death of her unborn child, abortion is likely to harm, not help, this girl and others like her,” the group noted.

The group cites one of the only studies done on women who became pregnant from sexual assault showing that nearly 80 percent of the women who aborted a pregnancy conceived in sexual assault reported that abortion had been the wrong solution.

The study, done in 1995 and published in the Journal of Anxiety Disorders finds most women who had abortions said that abortion only increased the trauma they were experiencing.

In many cases, the victim faced strong pressure or demands to abort and in some cases, especially those involving teenage girls, was even forced to have the abortion by others and none of the women who gave birth to a child conceived in sexual assault expressed regret or wished they had aborted instead.

“Further the survey found that in almost all the cases where the victim became pregnant through incest, abortion was chosen by the perpetrator to cover up the incest and the victim rarely, if ever, had a say in the matter,” the Elliot Institute noted.

“And studies of women who had unintended first pregnancies found that women who aborted were more likely than those who carried to term to have subsequent depression,2 anxiety3 and substance abuse,” the group added.

Other research found that teens who abort an unintended pregnancy are more likely to experience negative mental health outcomes than are teens who carry the unintended pregnancy to term, the study noted, too.

Ireland Forces European Union to Back Down on Pro-Abortion Africa Plan

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 21, 2007
Brussles, Belgium (LifeNews.com) -- Delegates to the European Union from Ireland have been successful in forcing it to moderate its support for an African plan that promotes abortion continent-wide. The African Union approved the pro-abortion Maputo Plan of Action, a non-binding resolution, in January and pro-life advocates have opposed it ever since.

Several African nations signed up to support the Maputo plan, which is seen as a move towards population control that could promote abortions and even forced abortions or sterilizations like those seen in China.

It urges African countries to "enact policies and legal frameworks to reduce incidence of unsafe abortion” and to “prepare and implement national plans of action to reduce incidence of unwanted pregnancies and unsafe abortion."

According to a Catholic World News report, the Irish delegation to the European Union questioned support for the plan at a meeting of European foreign ministers.

The Ireland lawmakers said an EU motion to support it would violate previous EU policy against officially endorsing abortion in other nations.

CWN reports that a MEPs reached a compromise agreement where the EU would support the plan only "within the context of EU policies."

In February, a leading pro-life congressman told a conference in Nigeria that the problem in Africa is not illegal abortions but a lack of basic health care, doctors and medical facilities.

Debunking the myth, Smith noted "it is false to claim that abortion will be safe if it is legal."

"Abortion is never safe for the child and can harm the woman physically, emotionally and psychologically whether legal or illegal," he explained.

Smith said that "complications from childbirth can be treated and women's lives saved if they have access to safe and sanitary birth delivery centers, delivery kits, trained birth attendants, antibiotics, clean blood transfusions and prevention and treatment of obstetric fistula."

The congressman added that an organized pro-life movement is needed in African nations like Nigeria because of the ratification of the Maputo plan.

Brazil Health Conference Rejects Abortion in Suggestions for Government

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
November 21, 2007

Brasilia, Brazil (LifeNews.com) -- Delegates to a national health conference in Brazil have rejected including abortion in a list of health care policy recommendations for the nation's government. Abortion advocates have been working overtime there to legalize abortion despite polls showing a strong majority of citizens there support its pro-life laws.

Participants at the 13th National Conference of Health voted on 400 various health care proposals, including a measure supported by pro-abortion groups to legalize abortion.

According to an Agencia Brasil report, 70 percent of the 2,627 delegates rejected the proposal and it will not be included in the final report sent on to government leaders.

The news agency said abortion was presented as a "public health problem" with claims that there are a large number of illegal abortions in the South American nation. Reportedly, delegates booed the presented of the pro-abortion measure during their presentation.

Clovis Boufleur of the Ministry for Children told Agencia Brasil that the vote “reflects the thinking of the Brazilian people."

“Abortion does not resolve the health problem in Brazil,” Boufleur explained.

In fact, an August 2006 poll by Datafolha published in Folha de Sao Paulo found some 63 percent of Brazilians say they favor the current law banning abortions.


Only 17 percent of Brazil residents want to change the law to legalize abortion and some 11 percent want abortions banned in all cases, including life of the mother or rape and incest. Another 9 percent had no opinion.

The Datafolha poll featured interviews with 6,969 Brazilians and had just a two percent margin of error because of the large sample size.

Also, a Pew Research firm poll from October 2006 found that 79 percent of Brazil residents said abortion was never justified, 16 percent said sometimes justified and just 4 percent said abortion was always justified.
The feeling of Brazilians is important because Brazil’s socialist-leaning president Luis Inacio Lula da Silva and Brazilian health minister Jose Gomes Temporao want to legalize abortion.

They have already announced a plan to distribute the morning after pill, which can cause abortions in limited circumstances, at no cost.

Temporao claimed as many as 200,000 women were having illegal abortions and suffering from life-threatening complications as a result. He abortions abortion legalized even though legal abortions still hurt women physically, emotionally and spiritually.

Cardinal Eusebio Oscar Scheid, the Archbishop of Rio de Janeiro, told a gathering of 10,000 people earlier this year that the church would not back down from supporting the law.

A new debate on abortion would be the second after the government backed down from a bill it sent congress in 2005 to try to legalize abortions.

If approved, the legislation would have legalized abortions up to 12 weeks into pregnancy and up to 20 weeks in cases of rape or incest, if the mother's life is at risk, or if the unborn child is unlikely to survive after birth.

Only Cuba, Mexico City and Guyana have legalized abortions in Latin America, but abortion advocates in Mexico, Colombia, Argentina and Uruguay are trying to authorize abortions there.


Europe Proceeds With Death Penalty Day Over Poland's Abortion Protest

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
October 9, 2007
Brussels, Belgium (LifeNews.com) -- The European Union will move ahead with a day to protest the death penalty despite objections from Polish officials, who wanted to include a condemnation of abortion as well. Polish leaders say nations are united against death penalty and insist the event should be used to mark the deaths of people from abortion.

The European Day Against Death Penalty will go ahead tomorrow after the Council of Europe approved a resolution to that effect.

Krzysztof Bosak, Polish member of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe, says any discussion of protecting human life should acknowledge those people who lose their lives to abortion or euthanasia.

"If we are to discuss life issues, let us be honest and not hypocritical," he told Polskie Radio. "It is not death penalty, but abortion and euthanasia that kills millions of innocent European citizens every year. This is a real problem that should be highlighted."

"As for values, it is not Poland who should be ashamed but abortion and euthanasia supporters who pretend to be pro-life when it comes to death penalty," he added.

Spanish Justice Minister Mariano Sanchez Bermejo previously vented his frustrations at Poland for holding up the event.

"Twenty-six countries in the EU want to celebrate a symbolic day against the death penalty but only one, Poland, is against," he said.

Poland, Ireland and Malta are the only three European nations that ban abortions. Portugal, which recently approved legislation allowing abortions up to 10 weeks into pregnancy, was the prime sponsor of the death penalty event.

The eastern European nation isn't likely to change its stance on the event as its ruling government leaders are fighting for pro-life votes in advance of an election scheduled for October 21.

Portugal was the first European nation to ban the death penalty, in 1876, and it hopes the continent will endorse its proposal for a day to mark the abolition in other countries as well.

Uganda Vice President Says He Can't Support Legalizing Abortion There
Kampala, Uganda (LifeNews.com) -- The second highest ranking official in the African nation of Uganda has said he doesn't support the legalization of abortion there. Vice President Gilbert Bukenya's comments come after a group of 10 leaders of African nations in June said their countries should allow abortions.

Representatives of Uganda attended the June conference, where leaders said abortion should be legalized because of claims of thousands of women dying from illegal abortions.

Responding to the call, Bukenya spoke at a Catholic church in the in Masaka District and said abortion contradicts the values of the African people. He spoke as leader of the Ngabi clan and discussed the unwritten laws that the people of Uganda have followed for centuries.

"The practice might be legal in some western countries, but we cannot adopt it here because our cultural norms are different," Professor Bukenya said.

"As a member of Parliament, I will definitely oppose any proposal to adopt such abnormal and immoral practices," he added.

Calls from other leaders to allow abortion appear to ignore evidence in industrialized nations that access to better health care, not abortion, reduces maternal mortality.

Catholic bishops in the southeastern African nation oppose abortion and highlighted that point.


"A state which legalizes abortion most definitely abdicates a very basic reason for its own existence," the bishops said in a statement.

The bishops said that it is "important ... to note that abortion has never put an end to women's social distress but that it simply adds a personal tragedy," adding that "there is no reason or motive that can ever objectively confer the right to dispose of another's life."

While reducing illegal abortion deaths is the prime motivation for legalizing abortion, leading researchers say proponents are relying on faulty numbers.

Dr. Randy O'Bannon, Education Director for National Right to Life, has said that the number of illegal abortions in developing countries is likely inflated.

According to the United Nations World Health Organization, 68,000 women die annually due to unsafe abortions.

"The precision implied in such numbers is highly misleading," O'Bannon says. He adds that such figures "are based on meager data and a lot of assumption-laden extrapolations."

Many of these countries do not maintain detailed birth or mortality records, much less abortion statistics, making even the roughest of estimates problematic," he explained.

WHO also relies on what is calls "public source data" to provide illegal abortion death guesses. Typically, a "public source" is a journal article, report, or unpublished document, often from a pro-abortion organization, raising questions about its objectivity.

O'Bannon says these sources of information are unreliable.


Amnesty International's Malta Branch Will Not Actively Advocate Abortion

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 23, 2007
Valleta, Malta (LifeNews.com) -- Amnesty International's recent decision to endorse abortion for victims of sexual abuse put some of its local chapters in nations that prohibit abortion in a quandary. On Thursday, the Malta AI affiliate said it would not join its international parent in actively campaigning for abortion.

The decision puts AI Malta in league with its Ireland counterpart, which has also indicated it will not actively promote overturning the pro-life laws of the western European nation.

Like Ireland, Malta is one of the few European nations to make abortion illegal and AI Malta’s spokesperson Jean Pierre Gauci indicated the human rights group's decision to endorse abortion will not change the way the Malta group operates.

He told the Malta Today newspaper that Amnesty doesn't expect his group to push to overturn the pro-life laws of the tiny island country.

“The decision was motivated by the situation in countries like Sudan, where women are systematically raped by militias and face death by stoning if they commit adultery,” Gauci said.

Gauci made it clear that the group would also not push for any new law in Malta allowing abortions in cases of rape or incest.

According to the newspaper, AI Malta did not participate in last week's international conference in Mexico City where national chapters voted to reaffirm the pro-abortion position the group's executive committee adopted in April.

Because it has only been active for a few years, AI Malta did not have a vote there.

Amnesty International's Ireland affiliate is the only other group to indicate it would go a slightly different direction from its parent group.

While the parent group and other national chapters may actively promote abortion in their nations or in other countries, Ireland's chapter will not push abortion there. The group will remain affiliated with Amnesty International and provide funding and support for it and its other programs.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Amnesty International that you want it to reverse its decision to support abortion. Go to http://web.amnesty.org/contacts/engindex to contact the group and express your opposition. Also, use the group's web site to find your national affiliate and tell them you oppose the idea.

Ireland Amnesty International Affiliate Won't Promote Pro-Abortion View

by Steven Ertelt
LifeNews.com Editor
August 19, 2007

Dublin, Ireland (LifeNews.com) -- The Ireland affiliate of Amnesty International will not promote the human rights group's pro-abortion position. It says it cannot back legal abortions in cases of rape and incest or when the woman's life is in danger because the position runs counter to the pro-life laws of the European nation.

Noeleen Hartigan, director at Ireland's Amnesty International office, confirmed to the Irish Times newspaper that the branch is opting out of supporting the policy.

The abortion policy, which has prompted outrage across the globe and calls from Catholic leaders for a boycott, will likely come up at AI Ireland meetings in the coming weeks.

The pro-life group Family & Life in Ireland told LifeNews.com it supports the group's decision.

"Amnesty International Ireland made its decision not to promote the new policy following a two-year consultation with members," the group said.

Meanwhile, a former AI member, Mary Stewart, told the Irish Times that she send her membership card back to the group in protest after it reaffirmed its executive committee's pro-abortion vote on Friday.

"I joined Amnesty because of its strong opposition to the death penalty but now opposition to the death penalty does not apply to unborn babies," she told the newspaper.

With their official backing, AI will now move ahead with plans to promote abortion in areas like Darfur and to try to get nations in places like Latin America and Africa to overturn their pro-life laws prohibiting abortions.

But it will have less support because of a boycott by Catholic leaders.

A senior Vatican official and a top American bishop have already called on Catholics worldwide to boycott the group because it supports abortion.

Before the vote, Cardinal Renato Martino, president of the Vatican's Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace, promised Catholics worldwide would boycott the human rights group.

"If in fact Amnesty International persists in this course of action, individuals and Catholic organizations must withdraw their support because, in deciding to promote abortion rights, Amnesty International has betrayed its mission," he said.

Bishop William Skylstad, president of U.S. Catholic bishops' conference, echoed the call for a boycott in July.

He said the decision to endorse abortion "undermines Amnesty's long-standing moral credibility, diverts its mission, divides its own members (many of whom are Catholic or defend the rights of unborn children), and jeopardizes Amnesty's support by people in many nations, cultures and religions."

Though AI took the position to respond to violence against women, Skylstad said it simply subjects women to more violence.

"A far more compassionate response is to provide support and services for pregnant women, advance their educational and economic standing in society, and resist all forms of violence and stigmatization against them," he added.

A Catholic layman, Peter Benenson, founded Amnesty International in 1961.

TAKE ACTION: Tell Amnesty International that you want it to reverse its decision to support abortion. Go to http://web.amnesty.org/contacts/engindex to contact the group and express your opposition. Also, use the group's web site to find your national affiliate and tell them you oppose the idea.
*     *     *     *     *
*     *     *     *     *
Nontraditional Pro-Lifers Attend March for Life

Washington, DC -- Scattered among tensof thousands of pro-life advocates
in Washington on Wednesday were Democrats, homosexuals, and feminists
marching to the beat of a different drummer. They were all participants in
the annual March for Life, which began near the Washington Monument and
ended at the U.S. Supreme Court.

Protecting the unborn from abortion is just one reason why a handful of
the Pro-Life Alliance of Gays and Lesbians (P.L.A.G.A.L.) carried its
pro-life banner from the Washington Monument to the footsteps of the U.S.
Supreme Court.

P.L.A.G.A.L. member, Andy Spedden, said he and fellow members traveled
from all parts of the country to "affirm human life because human rights
start when human life begins."

Spedden said P.L.A.G.A.L. is part of the "non-traditional" pro-life
movement along with other organizations representing feminists and college
students.

Unlike most gay and lesbian groups, they oppose abortion.

"Typically, the gay and lesbian rights movement has held that because what
a woman chooses to do with her body and what we might be assumed to choose
to do with our body correlates," Spedden said. "We maintain a difference
between the issues of private sexuality and abortion."

Jessica O'Connor-Pitts, a member of Feminists for Life, condemned
prominent feminist groups including the National Organization for Women
(NOW), NARAL-Pro-Choice America, and Planned Parenthood for promoting
abortion as part of their so-called empowerment message to women.

"I think it shows a failure to really consider the effects of abortion on
women and society," O'Connor-Pitts said of the feminist groups'
pro-abortion agenda.

"Women need more choices than just being pushed into the choice of
abortion," O'Connor-Pitts said. "We don't think abortion really meets the
needs of women."

O'Connor-Pitts said her group believes women are misled by traditional
feminist groups into believing that abortion is an acceptable way to
handle an unwanted pregnancy and its various complications.

"We think women turn to abortion because they don't have family support,
because they lack financial resources [and] because they may have other
fears and concerns," O'Connor-Pitts said. "Women deserve better than
that."

Meanwhile, pro-life Democrats carried the message that their party ought
to be pro-life.

"The [Democratic] Party supposedly is a 'big tent' party with no room in
it for people who care about life issues," said Democrats for Life (DFL)
National Vice-President Bill Pierce. "That's the problem."

For example, DFL Executive Director Kristen Day said the Democratic
National Committee (DNC) has ignored repeated attempts from her pro-life
organization to provide a hyperlink to the DFL's website, despite a
'conscience clause' in the DNC's by-laws. Day said the by-laws recognize
ideological differences between members.

"Our message is out that you can be pro-life and Democrat," Day said.
"They have all the other pro-abortion links on there and there's no reason
why they shouldn't link to us."

Jay Ware, the national treasurer of DFL, said the Democratic Party has
become recognized as the political party of pro-abortion advocates. But
nothing could be farther from the truth, he said.

"There's a lot of pro-life sentiment at the base of the party. People who
are African-American or Hispanic or union voters ... these people aren't
automatically pro-choice," Ware said. "It's just time for the party to get
some candidates out there to represent us [and] it's about time that the
base of the party starts demanding it."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Nontraditional Pro-Lifers Attend March for Life
Source:   Cybercast News Service; January 23, 2003

*     *     *     *     *
Gov. Davis banned from Children's Home
By ALEXA H. BLUTH, Associated Press Writer
Published 4:50 p.m. PST Thursday, December 19, 2002

SACRAMENTO (AP) - Democratic Gov. Gray Davis was banned from playing Santa Clause on Thursday at a Sacramento Catholic home for troubled children because he supports abortion rights.

Despite a 20-year tradition of California governors delivering Christmas gifts to the St. Patrick's Home for Children, the school's director barred Davis from school grounds unless he would ask forgiveness for and disavow his views on abortion.

Monsignor Edward J. Cavanaugh, director of the home since 1952, asked the governor to sign a letter declaring that he repents "of ever having promoted the killing of innocent unborn children."

"We don't let any pro-abortion people in our grounds here," Cavanaugh said. "He should get his life together and he should change his whole philosophy on the unborn. He should stand up for the sanctity of human life."

Davis refused to sign the letter, and instead invited children from the home to the state Capitol to fetch their gifts.

"He's entitled to his point of view and I'm entitled to mine. I'm unapologetically pro-choice and I'm not changing my position," Davis said. "Having said this, the tradition is about children, not grown-ups, I didn't want the kids to be disappointed."

Since 1981, state officials have provided about a dozen children at the rehabilitation home with gifts from their wish lists. Former governor's - including Jerry Brown, a Democrat who supported abortion rights - have visited the school to deliver the gifts.

Davis has not been personally going to the Sacramento school, aides said, because he usually spends the holidays in Los Angeles.

Cavanaugh said of Brown's visit, "This was before this thing became an issue." He also claimed that Davis used his visit "for political purposes."

By ALEXA H. BLUTH, Associated Press Writer
Published 4:50 p.m. PST Thursday, December 19, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Abortion: The Great Incest Cover-Up ... A Young Mother's Story
by Denise Kalasky

[ProLifeInfo.org Note:  Excerpted from "Victims and Victors: Speaking Out
About their Pregnancies, Abortions, and Children Resulting from Sexual
Assault." Copyright 2000, David C. Reardon, Julie Makimaa, and Amy Sobie.]

I was a victim of incest, one of the "hard cases" for abortion. I
was raped by my father when I was 15 years old. It was not the
first time, nor would it be the last. However, this time, I
became pregnant.

One night, I became very sick and my parents took me to the
hospital. I believe now that they knew I was pregnant since they
took me to a different hospital than normal. The emergency room
doctor  discovered that, along with a very bad case of the flu, I
was 19 weeks pregnant.

My father flew into a rage, accusing me of all sorts of things,
and demanding I have an abortion. The doctor informed me that I
was pregnant and asked me what I wanted. I had seen the "Silent
Scream" and knew that abortion was murder. In spite of the pain
and guilt I felt, knowing who the father of the baby was, it was
far better to have a baby than the alternative to kill it. I
refused to have an abortion.

My father flew into an uncontrollable rage and demanded that I
consent to the abortion, or that the doctor do it with or without
my permission. The doctor refused because of my wishes. My father
demanded that an abortionist be found regardless of the cost.

Within one hour, this man arrived at the hospital, talked with my
parents and decided to do the abortion, without speaking to me. I
refused and tried to get off the examining table. He then asked
three nurses to hold me while he strapped me to the bed and
injected me with a muscle relaxant to keep m from struggling
while he prepared to kill my baby.

I continued to scream that I didn't want an abortion. He told me,
"Shut up and quit that yelling!" Eventually, I was placed under
general anesthesia and my child was brutally killed.

I was told that an abortion would solve my problem, when it was
never really the problem in the first place.  I was told, "Your
parents know what's best," when they obviously were only
concerned about their own reputations.  I was told, "You made the
right decision," when I was never given a choice. More important,
where was my baby's choice?

I grieve every day for my daughter. I have struggled to forget
the abuse and the abortion. I can do neither. All I think of is,
"I should have done more, fought more, struggled more for the
life of my child."

My situation may not be common, but I know it's not unique
either. The emotions and problems I've had to deal with as a
result of my abortion are common. The trauma of the rape and
abuse were only intensified by the abortion. The guilt of knowing
my baby is dead is something I will have to live with for the
rest of my life.

I was violated and betrayed over and over by my father, who God
created to love and protect me. I was humiliated, hurt, and
violated again by the abortionist.

I have talked with "pro-lifers" who consider my abortion
acceptable, under the circumstances. I want to tell people, "If
you really want to be compassionate, give this mother the
opportunity to choose life for her child. If you really love the
mothers who have been victimized, don't let them be exploited
again by someone who will make a profit from their dead child a
memory that will haunt them for the rest of their lives."

The next time you hear of the "hard cases," please remind people
that every crisis pregnancy is difficult for the mother. If you
believe these cases are hard, you're correct  they are extremely
hard for the mother. But if you choose abortion, it's an
IMPOSSIBLE situation for the baby.

The mom needs love, support and understanding, not the pain of
allowing herself to be violated again in order to kill her child.
Regardless of the circumstances, regardless of the pain involved,
that helpless, innocent child has no voice, no defense, and no
chance, unless we offer real love and real compassion to the
mother.

My abortion was over five years ago. God is still healing me, but
it has been a difficult fight. Although I'm actively pro-life,
very few people know my story. It's still very difficult to share
with people.

"He heals the brokenhearted and binds up their wounds." (Psalm
147:3) God bless you!

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Abortion: The Great Incest Cover-Up ... A Young Mother's Story
Source:   The Elliot Institute; December 11, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
British Mom Refuses Abortion on Her Disabled Unborn Child

London, England -- A young British woman is defying medical advice in a
desperate bid to give her unborn baby the chance of life.

Doctors say the child, one of twins she is expecting, has no long-term chance
of survival and have advised an abortion.

The 19-year-old mother-to-be, who is being cared for at the region's leading
neonatal unit at the Royal Victoria Infirmary, is expecting the twins in just
over a month.

One of the babies, a girl, is believed to be perfectly healthy but the second
child, a boy, has a serious heart defect which doctors say is inoperable.

The mother was told about her child's fatal abnormality a month ago but
doctors advised her that an abortion would not be possible until very late on
in pregnancy because of the risk of triggering labour and jeopardising the
survival of the healthy twin.

However the woman, who has not been identified, has decided after weeks of
consideration not to terminate her child's life. She intends to give birth
naturally to the twins.

Len Fenwick, chief executive of the Newcastle Hospitals Trust, was not in a
position to comment. "We cannot make any comment in respect of the individual
circumstances of this particular patient," he said.

There are very strict guidelines drawn up by the Royal College of
Obstetricians and Gynaecologists which all hospitals must follow regarding
abortions.

The legal limit for an abortion is 24 weeks but a hospital has the legal
right to do an abortion right up until full term if they believe the mother's
or an unborn child's health is at risk.

The ethics surrounding late-term abortions are governed by a hospital's
ethics committee, as are other controversial medical procedures such as
switching off a life support machine.

The abortion would involve injecting a fatal dose of potassium chloride
directly into the baby's heart, which immediately triggers labour and the
birth of the dead baby soon afterwards. There are around 100 such late-term
abortions carried out each year in the UK.

There have been criticisms by pro-life groups that all abortions, including
those after 24 weeks -- the stage at which a child could survive if born
prematurely -- are morally wrong.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   British Mom Refuses Abortion on Her Disabled Unborn Child
Source:   The Journal; November 11, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Hollywood Feminists Offer Voice to Pro-Life Movement
by Raymond J. Keating

Can someone be both a feminist and a pro-lifer? I must confess to having
found such a scenario bewildering. A pro-life feminist seemed like an
oxymoron to me.

But just last week I discovered that feminism not only has deep historical
roots in opposition to abortion, but there also is an organization today
called Feminists for Life of America.

I came across this unexpected information because I happen to be a fan of the
television sitcom "Everybody Loves Raymond." (Who says you can't learn
anything worthwhile from watching TV?)

Perplexed? Let me explain.

Actress Patricia Heaton plays Debra, wife of Ray, on "Everybody Loves
Raymond." From reading her new book - "Motherhood & Hollywood: How to Get a
Job Like Mine" - I learned a bit more about Heaton over the past month or so.

Her book is quite engaging, including a good dose of irreverence, lots of
laughs, along with some worthwhile observations on career, friends and
family. In addition, Heaton's Christian faith comes through as she writes
fondly, and often amusingly, about growing up in a devout Roman Catholic home.

Today, Heaton calls herself "a staunch Presbyterian," and exhibits a healthy
perspective on what's ultimately important in life. She writes, "So much of
the world is all about distracting us from the reality of God, our Father.
The Great Spirit. He loves us. We need to love Him and each other."

I also found out that Heaton is pro-life, and apparently not shy about
expressing her views on issues such as abortion. In fact, she serves as
honorary chair of Feminists for Life.

Feminists for Life president, Serrin Foster, praised Heaton for being "the
first celebrity who was willing to speak out on our behalf," by taking "a
stand for women and for children." Foster noted that it's not easy to take a
pro-life stand in overwhelmingly pro-choice Hollywood.

But Foster mentioned a few other prominent names who have voiced their
pro-life beliefs, including Margaret Colin, who has appeared in assorted
movies including "Independence Day" and "Three Men and a Baby" and is
co-chair of Feminists for Life, Kate Mulgrew from "Star Trek: Voyager," and
Mel Gibson.

Even more interesting than the Hollywood aspect, though, is the history.

Foster told me, "Feminists for Life continues the tradition of the early
American feminists who opposed abortion." She noted that such luminaries as
Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, who "started the women's
movement in America," worked "to enact anti-abortion legislation." The
group's Web site presents assorted facts about the anti-abortion positions of
early feminists.

For example, the women's paper published by Anthony and Stanton - "The
Revolution" - strongly editorialized against abortion. And in a letter,
Stanton wrote, "When we consider that women are treated as property, it is
degrading to women that we should treat our children as property to be
disposed of as we see fit."

Foster hit on something when she said to me: "I think most people think that
they have to choose between children and women, and we're saying refuse to
choose, because women deserve better and every child deserves their chance at
life."

Many people believe that only conservatives are pro-life. Just note my
reaction at finding a feminist pro-life group, as well as my surprise
whenever I hear about a liberal opposing abortion.

In contrast, though, also consider Star Trek's Mulgrew calling herself a
liberal Democrat in the group's publication, "The American Feminist," while
also declaring, "Life is sacred to me on all levels. Abortion does not
compute with my philosophy."

To the extent that such political biases can be diminished through groups
like Feminists for Life and high-profile voices like Heaton, the better the
chance that more people will come to support both the innocent lives of the
unborn and the women - married or not, working inside or outside the home -
who carry the awesome responsibility of childbirth.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Hollywood Feminists Offer Voice to Pro-Life Movement
Source:   Newsday; November 5, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
The Decision That Changed My Life:  Keeping My Baby
by Maya Angelou

At age three, after the dissolution of her parents' marriage, the poet,
playwright and director Maya Angelou was raised, until age 14, in Stamps,
Arkansas, by her paternal grandmother. Angelou's eloquent series of five
memoirs includes I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings and, most recently, A Song
Flung Up to Heaven (Random House). Here the 74-year-old recounts the most
important even of her life, a daunting decision she faced after she
returned to San Francisco as a teen to live with her mother:

"When I was 16, a boy in high school evinced interest in me, so I had sex
with him -- just once. And after I came out of that room, I thought, Is
that all there is to it? My goodness, I'll never do that again! Then, when
I found out I was pregnant, I went to the boy and asked him for help, but
he said it wasn't his baby and he didn't want any part of it.

I was scared to pieces. Back then, if you had money, there were some girls
who got abortions, but I couldn't deal with that idea. Oh, no. No. I knew
there was somebody inside me. So I decided to keep the baby.

My older brother, Bailey, my confidant, told me not to tell my mother or
she'd take me out of school. So I hid it the whole time with big blouses!
Finally, three weeks before I was due, I left a note on my stepfather's
pillow telling him I was pregnant. He told my mother, and when she came
home, she calmly asked me to run her bath.

I'll never forget what she said: "Now tell me this -- do you love the boy?"
I said no. "Does he love you?" I said no. "Then there's no point in ruining
three lives. We are going to have our baby!"

What a knockout she was as a mother of teens. Very loving. Very accepting.
Not one minute of recrimination. And I never felt any shame.

I'm telling you that the best decision I ever made was keeping that baby!
Yes, absolutely. Guy was a delight from the start -- so good, so bright,
and I can't imagine my life without him.

At 17 I got a job as a cook and later as a nightclub waitress. I found a
room with cooking privileges, because I was a woman with a baby and needed
my own place. My mother, who had a 14-room house, looked at me as if I was
crazy!  She said, "Remember this: You can always come home." She kept that
door open. And every time life kicked me in the belly, I would go home for a few weeks.

I struggled, sure. We lived hand-to-mouth, but it was really heart-to-hand.
Guy had love and laughter and a lot of good reading and poetry as a child.
Having my son brought out the best in me and enlarged my
life. Whatever he missed, he himself is a great father today. He was once
asked what it was like growing up in Maya Angelou's shadow, and he said,
"I always thought I was in her light."

Years later, when I was married, I wanted to have more children, but I
couldn't conceive. Isn't it wonderful that I had a child at 16? Praise God!"

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   The Decision That Changed My Life:  Keeping My Baby
Source:   Family Circle; October 8, 200, Page 56

*     *     *     *     *
Miss America Censored on Her Abstinence Message

Washington, DC -- Miss America 2003, Erika Harold, yesterday said pageant
officials have ordered her not to talk publicly about sexual abstinence, a
cause she has advocated to teenage girls in Illinois.

"Quite frankly, and I'm not going to be specific, there are pressures from
some sides to not promote [abstinence]," the 22-year-old woman from Urbana,
Ill., told The Washington Times.
    
In her first visit to Washington since winning the crown Sept. 21, Harold
resisted efforts by Miss America officials to silence her pro-chastity
opinions.
    
"I will not be bullied," Harold said yesterday at the National Press Club,
as officials tried to prevent reporters from asking questions about her
abstinence message. Harold, a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of the University of
Illinois, was "furious" as she arrived for yesterday's press conference, an
acquaintance said.
    
George Bauer, interim chief executive officer of the Miss America
organization, and other pageant officials had sternly directed her to talk
only about the issue of youth-violence prevention and to say nothing about
sexual abstinence, said Harold's acquaintance, who asked not to be named.
    
"They laid it on her coming over here" not to promote teen chastity, the
acquaintance said before the press conference began. "She's furious about
it."
   
Bauer did not respond to inquiries made yesterday through Miss America
corporate headquarters in Atlantic City, N.J. The pageant has traditionally
been skittish about sexual subjects, and at one time forbade Miss America
-- and even contestants -- to be alone in a room with any man, even fathers
and brothers, without a chaperone.

Harold has advocated premarital chastity through the years as she traveled
about Illinois on behalf of Project Reality, a Chicago-based nonprofit that
has been a pioneer in the field of abstinence education. By the time she
won the Miss Illinois crown in June, Miss Harold had presented that message
to more than 14,000 young people.
    
Since 1990, Miss America and affiliated state pageants have required
contestants to adopt an official "platform" issue. Harold won the Miss
Illinois contest with her platform of "Teenage Sexual Abstinence: Respect
Yourself, Protect Yourself." But state pageant officials instead selected
"teen violence prevention" as her Miss America contest platform because
they deemed it more "pertinent," her father told an Illinois newspaper.
    
Yesterday, Harold said, she is "still in the process of coming up with what
it is that I can say," in interweaving her pro-chastity views with her
official platform.
    
After winning the Miss America crown, Harold said a young girl from an
inner-city Chicago school sent her an e-mail asking her to continue the
abstinence campaign. "She said, 'You changed my life because of what you
said, and now I made the decision to be abstinent because of what you said.
And I really hope that as Miss America you continue to share that because
it changed my life and I think it can change lots of others.'"
    
Said Harold: "And I would hate to think that there are kids all over the
country who now wonder, you know, 'Did I make the right decision in making
that commitment, if this person who inspired me to do it no longer is
willing to share that commitment on the national stage?' And so I would
feel a hypocrite if I did not."
    
Harold said abstinence education is an important component of
youth-violence prevention because violence is directly related to sexual
permissiveness and promiscuity. "I think that if a young person is engaged
in a promiscuous lifestyle, it makes them vulnerable to other risk factors,
so I definitely see a tie-in there," she said.
    
"Many victims of sexual harassment believe what is said about them, and
they become very promiscuous. When they're called a whore, when they're
called a slut, they think, 'That's what I want to be,' and so they engage
in a pattern of self-destruction that can be very detrimental to their
lives.
    
"And when I went through that experience, I took the opposite approach, and
said I'm going to believe in who I am. I'm not going to be defined by what
other people think about me. And so I felt very, very fortunate that I had
parents, I had a faith community who reinforced this decision, and I was
able to speak about this. I didn't take the route of becoming promiscuous;
I took the route of reaffirming what I believed was right and stood for it.
And I was very fortunate to be able to speak to thousands of young people
about this."
    
The new Miss America had meetings yesterday with Attorney General John
Ashcroft and Surgeon General Richard Carmona.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Miss America Censored on Her Abstinence Message
Source:   Washington Times; October 9, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
New Country Music Single Deals With Past Abortion
   
Nashville, TN -- Tim McGraw began his career as a country radio hitmaker with
the lyrical
controversy of "Indian Outlaw." Eight years later, another more sober McGraw
song is again sparking consternation among some listeners.

The lyric of "Red
Rag Top," the first single from McGraw's upcoming Curb album (due Nov. 26),
deals with an abortion and its emotional aftermath. While most country radio
programmers support the song and say that listener reaction has been
positive, others report complaint calls, and a few have pulled the song or
refused to play it altogether.

Written by Jason White, "Red Rag Top" begins as a coming-of-age song about
the relationship between an 18-year-old woman and the 20-year-old narrator.
But in the second verse, the woman is pregnant, and the narrator sings, "Life
was fast and the world was cruel/We were young and wild/We decided not to
have a child/So we did what we did and we tried to forget/ And we swore up
and down there would be no regrets."

In the song's final verse, the couple has long broken up, and the narrator
sings, "You do what you do and you pay for your sins/And there's no such
thing as what might have been/ That's a waste of time."

WSM-FM (Live 95) Nashville pulled the song after a handful of spins because
of listener complaints about the lyrics. Program director Kevin O'Neal, who
says he "was just being safe," has since reversed that decision. "I think the
song is reality," he adds. "We're not in the censor business."

But WCOS Columbia, S.C., operations manager/PD Ron Brooks says he is
"unlikely" to ever play the song again because of a strong negative reaction
from his audience. "Abortion is the most divisive issue in our nation, and it
is a very hot topic in this part of the country," Brooks explains. "I think
it is bad business to play a song that is likely to alienate 40% to 50% of
the audience. This is not a 'political correctness' controversy, like 'Indian
Outlaw.' It is a true, broad-reaching social and political issue."

Such controversy doesn't appear to have held the record back on Billboard's
Top Country Singles & Tracks chart. It debuted at No. 34 a few weeks ago,
rising to No. 18 this week.

Curb Records VP of promotion and media strategy Carson James says he has
heard very little negative feedback from radio. "It's about three things:
pain, loss, and regret," he says of the song. "It's country personified."
WYAY (Eagle 106.7) Atlanta PD Steve Mitchell agrees. He fielded a complaint
"from a father who was riding in the car with his son [who] asked what they
meant about not keeping the child. To anyone who would complain, I would
simply say, 'Next time, listen to the whole song.'"

Several PDs, like KMLE Phoenix's Jeff Garrison, note that "country songs have
always been about real life. 'Red Rag Top' is another great song about life."
That's how McGraw's manager, Scott Siman of rpm management, sees it. "Tim,
when he heard the song, recognized that it was a real song about real issues
and things people have to deal with," he says. "He views it as truly a slice
of life."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  New Country Music Single Deals With Past Abortion
Source:   Billboard; October 6, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Black Americans to Hold March for Life in Birmingham

Birmingham, AL -- Nearly 50 years ago, blacks and whites marched on
Birmingham, Alabama, to protest the city's segregation laws. It was the
beginning of the modern Civil Rights movement. In less than two weeks, blacks
and whites will again march on Birmingham -- this time for the most
fundamental of all civil rights, the right to life.

Beginning on October 12, black pastors and pro-life leaders in Birmingham
will lead others on a three-day march through the city to bring attention to
the disproportionate number of black babies aborted every day. The nation's
largest black pro-life organization, Life Education and Resource Network
(LEARN), is hosting the march. Its theme is "Say So," as in "If you love the
children, say so!"

"More black babies are killed in a three-day period by abortion than were
ever lynched in the history of America," said Damon Owens, LEARN's national
spokesman.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's December 2000
report, black women account for 36 percent of all abortions performed, even
though blacks represent 12 percent of the population.

In 1996, the Alan Guttmacher Institute (Planned Parenthood's research arm)
reported: "Blacks, who make up 14 percent of all childbearing women, have 31
percent of all abortions and whites, who account for 81 percent of women of
childbearing age, have 61 percent."

"Abortion is the number-one killer of blacks," said the Rev. Johnny Hunter,
LEARN's national director in North Carolina. said. "We're losing our people
at the rate of 1,452 a day. That's just pure genocide. Sanger's influence and
the whole mindset Planned Parenthood has brought into the black community …
say it's okay to destroy your people. We bought into the lie."

Hunter and leaders from other chapters of LEARN, including Pastor Clenard
Childress (director of LEARN New Jersey) and Elder Ceasar LeFlore (of LEARN
Chicago), are bolstering the march on Birmingham. Star Parker, founder of the
Coalition on Urban Renewal and Education, is expected to deliver the keynote
address. Participants include adults who, as children, participated in the
Civil Rights struggle nearly a half century ago in Birmingham.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Black Americans to Hold March for Life in Birmingham
Source:   Concerned Women for America; October 3, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Hollywood Celebs Take Pro-Life Message to TV Shows

New York, NY -- Helping to shatter the myth that Hollywood celebrities are
ubiquitously pro-abortion, two high-profile women -- former supermodel
Kathy Ireland and Patricia Heaton, Emmy-winning actress for her role on the
CBS comedy, "Everybody Loves Raymond" -- challenged that notion by speaking
openly about their pro-life views.

Ireland appeared Monday on Fox News Channel's "Hannity and Colmes," where
Alan Colmes, the show's resident liberal, pressed her on the abortion
issue. Here is a small excerpt of their conversation:

COLMES: We played a little clip from last time you were on the show. And I
asked you if you had a liberal position. And for those who didn't see it
earlier, you said yes, I'm liberal about the rights of the unborn child.
Now I think I'm conservative on abortion because I think the government
should not be involved. And that this is not a governmental issue. It's a
personal issue. So wouldn't I then have the conservative position here?

IRELAND: Is it all right for the government to allow the murder of an
innocent human being? The evidence I see tells me the unborn is a human
being. From the moment of conception, a new life comes into being with a
complete genetic blueprint. The sex is determined. The blood type is
determined.

IRELAND: If you can, Alan, if you can show me evidence that the unborn is
not a human being, I will gladly join the pro-choice side. If you can show
me any evidence. It's very clear and simple.

Last time I was on, you said we're not going to resolve this right now but
it's very simple. The bottom line is this. If the unborn is not a human
being, have as many abortions as you want, whenever you want. It doesn't
matter. No justification is necessary. If, on the other hand, the unborn is
a human being, no justification is adequate unless another human life, that
being the mother, is in danger.

(later in the show)

HANNITY: Kathy, welcome back. Sean Hannity here. You know, since the last
time you were
on, we had an enormous amount of e-mail from people that were frankly
shocked that
somebody as famous, well known as yourself, take such a strong pro-life
position. Are
there more of these famous people that are just not willing to state these
things
publicly?

IRELAND: I know it's not a popular issue. And I was always pro- choice. I'm
a person who
always has and always will fight for the rights of women. And even though I
became a
Christian at age 18, I remained pro- choice because I believed it was a
woman's choice.
But the moment that I learned that the unborn was a human being, not part
of the woman's
body..

HANNITY: Yes.

IRELAND: ...but its own individual human being, I have no choice but to
defend the most
vulnerable among us.

HANNITY: Well, it's admirable, because I agree with you on the position.
And especially
with what modern technology now offers in terms of our ability to see
inside a woman's
womb.

IRELAND: Absolutely.

HANNITY: And the heart beating and the fingers and the toes.

IRELAND: You really can't argue with it. Technology has come a long way
since Roe vs.
Wade.

Heaton, meanwhile, appeared Tuesday on Fox News Channel's "The O'Reilly
Factor." Heaton came on the show to talk about her new book, "Motherhood
and Hollywood: How to Get a Job Like Mine," but host Bill O'Reilly quickly
shifted the discussion to her pro-life views. Here is a part of their
conversation:

O'REILLY: All right. A couple of interesting things in your book, and we --
put it this
way, ladies and gentlemen. If we have somebody on here, the book's not
going to be a dog.
If the book's bad, we're not going to have them on here.

So you are pro-life in a town...

HEATON: That's right.

O'REILLY: ... that is almost 100 percent pro-choice. How does that impact
on you?

HEATON: Well, you know, I'm a chairman of Feminists for Life, and so I
think that, because
of that, we have an interesting stand that most people don't -- haven't
heard before,
which is being pro-life can be a feminist issue.

The early feminists were pro-life. And really abortion is a huge disservice
to women, and
it hasn't been presented that way. So -- so it's a -- there's a sort of an
in for me
because of that take on it.

O'REILLY: Do you take any heat from your peers out there?

HEATON: I did. I mean, I did originally. I vote Republican because of my
pro-life stance,
and, of course, that was a real hot-button issue when Bill Clinton was
first elected.

I mean, people really -- I wore a Quayle-Bush button, and literally people
would stop and
look at the button the and look at me and give me dirty looks and, you
know, say nasty
things to me.

O'REILLY: But, still, I mean, if Susan Sarandon or Barbra Streisand were
here, I mean,
they wouldn't talk to you. They would turn their back on you.

HEATON: You know what? It's not that polarized. I mean, people know me
first as an actress
and friend.

O'REILLY: Would you ban abortion?

HEATON: As -- Feminists for Life -- what we're trying to do is support
women, and so what
we want to do is for -- reach women on campus -- college campuses so that,
when they get
pregnant, they can find housing. They can find money they need to stay in
school.

O'REILLY: So you're giving -- you're putting an alternative track out there.

HEATON: Yes. I think pro-choice is a ridiculous -- you know...

O'REILLY: But it all comes down to... would you ban it if you were a
Supreme Court justice? Would you vote to ban it?

HEATON: Yes.

O'REILLY: You would?

HEATON: Yes.

O'REILLY: OK. Now that, obviously, takes guts in Hollywood because, in
Hollywood, there's
a subtext that, if you don't play the game, you know, you could lose jobs.

HEATON: Yes.

O'REILLY: Did you ever think of it?

HEATON: Yes, I've thought about it. On a personal level, as a Christian, it
will not be Barbra Streisand I'm standing in front of when I have to make
an accounting of my life.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Hollywood Celebs Take Pro-Life Message to TV Shows
Source:   Fox News Channel; September 30, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
MISS AMERICA: THE REST OF THE STORY

You've heard about the spat between the two Miss North Carolinas, taking
their tiara tussle to court for a chance to compete in the Miss America pageant.
But have you heard about Miss Illinois Erika Harold, who actually captured the
crown? It seems Ms. Harold is at the center of something a lot more
scandalous than topless photos, something so racy, that much of the press won't even
touch it with a ten-foot pole. Ms. Harold is into abstinence.
As a University of Illinois graduate with plans to attend Harvard Law
School and practice public policy law, Ms. Harold partnered with Project Reality,
an Illinois-based nonprofit centered on abstinence education, and with
Abstinence Clearinghouse, a national educational organization that promotes
abstinence.
"She came to us four years ago," said Libby Gray of Project Reality. "She
was running for Miss Illinois and wanted to focus on abstinence. She found us
and actually she's helped us to find the other pageant winners" that had
abstinence as their platforms.
The influence she and other titleholders have had on members of Congress
has been quite noteworthy.  "They are wonderful because they're young, they're
in touch with young people all the time," said Michael Schwartz, Concerned
Women for America's Vice President of Government Relations.
"These are winners, and I don't mean they came in first at a beauty
pageant," said Schwartz, who worked with Ms. Harold in 1999 while she was lobbying
legislators. "When they give their testimony about how good abstinence is,
they're very convincing."
Gray does believe that the media is warming up to the idea of abstinence,
pointing to Miss Wisconsin 1999 Mary Louis Kurey, another Project Reality
spokesperson who was asked several times to appear on Politically
Incorrect.
"Each time it was harder and harder to convince the audience that she
wasn't believable," said Gray.
Source: Beverly LaHaye Institute (mail@beverlylahayeinstitute.org)

*     *     *     *     *
Actress Tells Senate "I Paid for My Abortion My Whole Life"

Washington, DC -- Actress Jennifer O'Neill shared the painful memories of
her abortion with more than sixty-five House and Senate staff members at a
Capitol Hill briefing Monday afternoon.

"I had the abortion and paid for it all my life until I healed and am now
able to help other women," O'Neill tearfully told the audience.

In an effort to overcome the emotional despair, O'Neill turned to shock
therapy. Unable to cure her depression, she set her sights towards Heaven
and eventually came to her present-day Christian faith. Now, she finds
solace in the forgiveness God provides.

Like O'Neill, some 43 percent of women who have reached the age of 45 have
had an abortion -- approximately 25 million women total. However, women who
have abortions don't celebrate the decision and the truth rarely makes it
past immediate family and close confidants.

"If it's such a good idea, why is it shrouded in secrecy," O'Neill asked
the audience.

O'Neill urged the passage of laws that would make information about the
emotional and physical complications following an abortion available to
women prior to her abortion decision. "I was told a lie from the pit of
hell -- that my baby was just a blob of tissue."

A former "Cover Girl" model for an unprecedented 30 years, O'Neill spoke at
the Senate briefing on behalf of the Women Deserve Better campaign. The
outreach is an effort of a group of pro-life organizations dedicated to
advancing the pro-woman aspects of the pro-life message. Their goal:
highlight how abortion hurts women and provide women with practical
resources to choose alternatives to abortion.

"Of course the protection of the unborn child is at the center of my
heart," O'Neill explained. "However, the aftermath of abortion can be
equally deadly for both mother and unborn child. [A woman who has an
abortion] is sentenced to bear that for the rest of her life."

O'Neill discussed the pattern of coercion that sometimes compels a young
woman to have an abortion. Such pressured abortions can be caused by
schools that lack adequate resources for pregnant college students or
parents who don't want to help a teen mother raise a child.

"There is no quick fix for an unplanned pregnancy," O'Neill said. "But
where do teens go when told they are going to be kicked out of the house if
they have the child?"

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Actress Tells Senate "I Paid for My Abortion My Whole Life"
Source:   Pro-Life Infonet; September 23, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Costa Rican President Spurns UN Pressure to Support Abortion

Johannesburg, South Africa -- The Costa Rican newspaper "Al Dia" reports
that Costa Rican President Abel Pacheco was angered by a confrontation he
had with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Mary Robinson.
The paper reports that the President himself confirmed that Robinson
visited him at his hotel demanding he support objectionable language in the
Earth Summit document.

"She wanted Costa Rica to sign an amendment that some of us believe would
be an opening for abortion. The text does not mention it specifically, but
it speaks about guaranteeing the right to health for women all over the
world, with which I agree.  But it seems that in prior meetings it had been
determined that one of the health rights of women was abortion, and that I
cannot support" explained Pacheco

Pacheco was astonished, and incensed with Robinson's reaction to his
refusal to support the abortion language.  She stormed out of the meeting
"very upset" reports the paper.

"I do not see how can she think that I am President of a Banana Republic,
and believe that she is going to impose upon us, so that Costa Rica will
have to do whatever she thinks it is right," stated the President
emphatically.  "I told her that Costa Rica, in its Constitution, is a
Catholic country, that I am Catholic, and as a doctor I have taken an oath
to defend life above everything, and if that was going to be an opening to
legalize abortion, I could not agree with it, and Costa Rica would not
support it."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Costa Rican President Spurns UN Pressure to Support Abortion
Source:   Al Dia; September 4, 2002

*     *     *     *     *
Young Father Comes of Age After Losing Abortion Battle

Washington, DC -- When Nicholas DiGiovanni left his small-town home just
outside of New Orleans for college in 1997, things like abortion and raising
a child could not have been further from his teenage mind.

But when a short romantic relationship during his second year of college
resulted in a pregnancy, DiGiovanni had no choice but to start thinking about
it. And think about it he did.

What began as a simple objection to his girlfriend's growing determination to
have an abortion led to a firm conviction of fatherly responsibility toward
his unborn child, and it wasn't long before he was offering to raise the
child completely on his own. He soon found himself embroiled in a full-blown
court battle to preserve the unborn baby's life.

DiGiovanni was a 19-year-old sophomore at Louisiana Tech University when he
filed a lawsuit that imposed an abortion injunction on his pregnant
girlfriend in 1999. The injunction held up for weeks, but was eventually
overturned. The young woman immediately responded by having the abortion.

DiGiovanni's case was not unlike that of John Stachokus, who went to court in
Pennsylvania July to stop his girlfriend, Tanya Meyers, from having an
abortion.

Like DiGiovanni, Stachokus did not prevail, and both cases illustrate the
three-way tug-of-war over a woman's legal right to abort her unborn baby, the
child's right to life, and the father's right to have any say in the matter.

DiGiovanni, whose parents raised him and his two sisters Catholic, remembers
his childhood fondly, saying that much of the person he is today can be
attributed to the values instilled in him by his father.

"Fatherhood breeds fatherhood," DiGiovanni explained, saying that, although
he left for college not having given much thought to such matters as
abortion, his eventual decision to take a strong pro-life stance essentially
stemmed from what his father taught him about responsibility.

DiGiovanni's early frat-house days were what he called the "typical college
lifestyle," saying he was too busy "partying and not really thinking about
anything other than myself and where I'm going to drink tonight" to consider
any issue as serious as abortion.

"I didn't really know what abortion was or anything," DiGiovanni said,
recalling how he had to look up the word 'contraception' in the dictionary.
"I had no idea whatsoever. All I knew was she was pregnant and that she was
talking about abortion."

"She was confused, she was obviously very emotional, [and] she didn't want to
be a mother," said DiGiovanni, who became equally convicted that he had a
responsibility to protect their child.

"I spent a lot of time praying about it and I realized, you know, that I have
a good father and I always wanted to be the same father to my child that my
father was to me," DiGiovanni said. "I [wanted] to assume my responsibilities
[for] the action that I made, even though the initial action wasn't good."

After several attempts to set up counseling sessions and convince his former
girlfriend that he "wasn't just going to leave as soon as the baby was born,"
DiGiovanni said he grew desperate and decided to seek legal assistance.

"Basically, time was crunching and I had to do something," DiGiovanni said.

DiGiovanni said he contacted several lawyers before finding one that would
even talk to him, but managed to find an attorney who was able to obtain an
injunction that was served to the pregnant woman on her way to the abortion
clinic, preventing the abortion.

"I was basically saying, 'hey, I'm suing for my fatherhood here,'" DiGiovanni
said. "If she didn't want to be a mother, then at least [she should] carry
the baby and let me be a father."

The last-minute injunction survived almost four weeks before being overturned
in later court proceedings.

DiGiovanni said his former girlfriend "had lawyers from the Center for
Reproductive Law and Policy that literally tried everything they could to
kill my child as quickly and as efficiently as possible."

"They were fighting ruthlessly to kill my child and they don't even know me,
they don't know her, they don't know my baby," he said.

When the original injunction was overturned, the student's only hope was to
appeal, but DiGiovanni said it was the end of the week preceding the Easter
holiday, and he was unable to take action in time.

The abortion was performed on Good Friday, 1999, rendering DiGiovanni's case
legally moot.

DiGiovanni's battle for his unborn child was bigger than he anticipated,
attracting almost as much media attention as opposition.

Since the case more than three years ago, he has been determined to preserve
the memory of his unborn baby - named Baby Genesis - in order to further the
pro-life cause and fight against what he calls a "culture of death."

DiGiovanni, 23, is now a junior studying psychology at George Mason
University in Fairfax, Va. In addition, he is involved in pro-life work.

For DiGiovanni, preserving life means ensuring that Baby Genesis has a
positive impact on people's lives.

"That's what I'm here to do, and that's what I've been trying to do for the
past couple years," he said. "And hopefully will have the opportunity to do
for the rest of my life."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Young Father Comes of Age After Losing Abortion Battle
Source:   Cybercast News Service; August 12, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Malta Government Responds to EU's Pro-Abortion Recommendation

Malta --The Maltese government yesterday wrote to the secretary general of
the European Parliament on the resolution taken recently about "sexual and
reproductive health and rights," making clear its stand against abortion.

Malta's Permanent Delegate to the EU, Ambassador Victor Camilleri, outlined
the government's position on abortion.

The letter was written in response to another by the secretary general of the
European Parliament drawing attention to a number of resolutions adopted by
the European Parliament, including the one about abortion.

The European Parliament had recommended that abortion be made legal and
accessible to all.

Mr Camilleri wrote that the government's position was clear and unequivocal
and that "not only is abortion illegal in Malta, but succesive governments...
have been strongly committed to retaining the legal prohibition and have held
this position also in the context of European and international fora, not
least at the level of the United Nations".

The letter also notes that the issue of whether or not abortion should be
legalized is a domestic one in which the European Union, in terms with its
acquis communautaire and in line with the principle of subsidiarity, "has no
competence to act, decide or legislate".

The government also said it was confident "that this will remain the position
of Malta after membership" and that as a member state of the European Union,
Malta "will continue to advocate its strong determination against abortion as
a faithful reflection of the values of the Maltese people".

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Malta Government Responds to EU's Pro-Abortion Recommendation
Source:   Pro-Life Infonet; July 23, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Kenya Citizens Rally Against Abortion

Nairobi, Kenya -- Pro-life advocates yesterday held a procession on Nairobi
streets, condemning abortion as "silent murder of the defenceless".

The campaigners, who included medical doctors, asked for tough laws on
abortion. They urged the Government to crack down on abortion facilities.

The walk started at the Holy Family Basilica and proceeded to Uhuru Park
where talks on the effects of abortion were given.

The procession, bringing together members of different churches, included a
hearse carrying two caskets, a large and small one. The caskets were
symbolic of mothers and unborn babies who perish during abortions.

The coffins had black and red T-shirts with the inscription: "You were not
aborted, give me a chance to live, too. Abortion is killing."

Dr Jean Kagia, the chairperson of the Christian Medical Fellowship of
Kenya, said 700 abortions are done daily in Kenya by girls aged between 15
and 19 years. Some 5,000 women die every year from abortion complications.

The executive director of Crisis Pregnancy Ministries, Ms Grace Ojiambo,
challenged the church to change its attitude against girls who become
pregnant. "The Church as a body for peace and solace should encourage these
girls by supporting their needs," she said.

Young people interviewed said abortion was murder. Philip Muasa, 22, said:
"It is a God-given right to live. Those who do it will be punished by God,
even if they escaped the law."

Eighteen-year-old Fautin Mulu said: "Abortion is evil and one may not know
whom you are killing. You could be killing future priests, doctors,
president or the only child God had meant for you."

Patricia Musundi, 26, said life starts at conception and the fact that one
cannot talk or fight back should be no justification for murder through
abortion.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Kenya Citizens Rally Against Abortion
Source:   The Nation (Kenya); July 21, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Poland Rejects European Union's Pro-Abortion Pressure

Warsaw, Poland -- Politicians in Poland have reacted angrily to a vote by the
European Parliament calling for abortion to be legalized across current and
future EU member states.

The European Parliament's resolution, which is non-binding, says women should
have easy access to abortion, and no-one should be prosecuted for having one.

It singles out largely Roman Catholic Poland and Ireland, among others, as
the two countries where abortion is most severely restricted.

But the Polish parliament's European affairs committee rejected what it
called pro-abortion pressure on candidate countries. Abortion was legal in
Poland until five years ago, when the then government banned it in most
circumstances.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Poland Rejects European Union's Pro-Abortion Pressure
Source:   BBC; July 4, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
CANADA - JAMES KOPP FLED OUT OF FEAR

Accused sniper James Kopp says he fled the U.S. after being named as a
suspect in the murder of a New York doctor because he believed he would
suffer the same fate as a prominent Vancouver anti-abortionist found dead
in his truck.  Kopp spent six weeks in an Italian jail in 1989 with Maurice
Lewis, a man who used to protest regularly outside Vancouver's Everywoman's
abortion clinic.

In a letter to friends, a copy of which was obtained by The Vancouver Sun,
Kopp professes his innocence and says he doesn't believe an RCMP report
that states Lewis' 1997 death was due to accidental asphyxiation with no foul
play involved. Lewis, a long-distance truck driver, was found dead in his
rig in Ontario.

In the five page handwritten letter dated June 23, 2001, Kopp says he was a
close friend of Lewis. Kopp wrote the letter from a French jail cell where
he has been held since his arrest last year in connection with the shooting
death of Dr. Barnett Slepian, a doctor from Buffalo, N.Y., who performed
abortions.

"So the death of Maurice weighed on my mind in the Fall 1998, when the
first news of the FBI seeking me as a witness came on the news. (i.e.. if that's
how they treated Maurice, what about me?)"

Kopp also stated emphatically that he is innocent of the Slepian murder,
citing holes he believes exist in the evidence presented by the FBI to
date.

"As I told the extradition judge here, I am innocent of this terrible thing
and I desire to enter an American court as soon as possible to clear my
name," Kopp wrote.

Source: Pro-Life E-News (enews@interlife.org)

(JamesKopp.com)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
COLLEGE STUDENTS LAUNCH WALK FOR LIFE

WASHINGTON D.C. --- "This summer, America's highways will be our platform
for our message of life," says Adam Redmon, director of Crossroads, a
division of American Life League.  "We owe it to every single innocent
human being to expose the most evil force on earth today -- the Culture of
Death."

For the past seven years, Crossroads has sponsored college students who
walk across the country, pray at abortion facilities, speak at churches and
host town hall meetings to educate the public about abortion.

Two teams of Crossroads walkers will cover more than 4,000 miles on foot
this summer. The northern team begins its walk in San Francisco while the
southern team begins its journey in Tampa, Florida.  Both teams start
walking on May 20 and arrive in Toronto, the site of World Youth Day, on
July 22.

Source: American Life League (media@all.org)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Student Receives Support From Legal Group to Wear Pro-Life Shirt

Canyon, TX -- John Denton, a junior at Canyon High School in Canyon,
Texas, decided he would express his pro-life views at school by wearing a
sweatshirt displaying the message "Abortion is Homicide."  However, even
before the first period bell had rung, the principal confronted him in the
school hall and ordered him to take off the sweatshirt and leave it in his
office because the message may cause problems.

Denton has not worn his pro-life sweatshirt since, but he did contact the
Thomas More Law Center.

As a result, the Thomas More Law Center's Associate Counsel Edward White,
sent a four page demand letter to the Canyon school officials explaining
Denton's clearly established constitutional right to wear his pro-life
clothing and demanding that the school take immediate action to provide
written assurance that Denton would be permitted to wear his pro-life
sweatshirt to school.  The Center explained that a school cannot restrict
a student's free speech rights based upon mere speculation that the
student's message may cause problems in the school.

According to White, "Should the school disregard this demand and continue
to violate the student's rights, the Center is prepared to seek
appropriate relief in federal court at no charge to the student and his
family."

Richard Thompson, the Center's Chief Counsel, observed, "This is another
unfortunate example of a school trying to silence a student's pro-life
views.  A school cannot confine a student to expressing only 'officially
approved' messages."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Student Receives Support From Legal Group to Wear Pro-Life Shirt
Source:   Thomas More Law Center; May 6, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
FLORIDA CITY TO HAVE MEMORIAL FOR UNBORN

Mary Hubbard compares trying to forget her abortion to stuffing a beach ball
under water.  "Sooner or later it surfaces," said the Jacksonville woman, who
still cries over her decision 25 years later.  Today, Hubbard is eagerly waiting
to post a plaque in honor of the unborn child she has since named Joy.

The plaque will be part of Florida's First Coast Memorial for the Unborn, an
80-foot, L-shaped granite wall planned for downtown Jacksonville.  Thepublic
memorial will have room for more than 10,000 1-by-3-inch brass plaques engraved
with messages from parents to their aborted children.  Plaques will cost
$35 each.

The wall will be an affiliate of the National Memorial for the Unborn in
Chattanooga, Tenn., a Christian ministry devoted to the sanctity of human
life and the memory of aborted children. There are about a dozen affiliated
memorials in the country, according to leaders of the ministry.

The Jacksonville project will help women find closure, advance their healing
and honor God by showing respect for life, organizers said.

Source: Pro-Life E-News (enews@interlife.org)

ARGENTINA - "DAY OF THE UNBORN" TRADITION CONTINUES

BUENOS AIRES, MARCH 24, 2002 (ZENIT.org).- On Monday, the usual day for the
feast of the Annunciation, several Latin American countries will celebrate
the Day of the Unborn.

The celebration was first established at the civil level by Argentina in
1998. Nicaragua and Costa Rica followed suit. Other Latin American
countries will observe the day, though it is not officially recognized at
the civil level.

A key event in Argentina will be held in Mendoza: the 3rd Pro-Life and
Pro-Family Caravan, with the motto "Let´s Celebrate as a Family the Hope of
New Life."

Source: ZENIT News Agency (english@zenit.org)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
PRO-LIFE TEACHER OBJECTS TO UNION DUES

TEACHERS UNION: Springfield, Mass., educator Gerard O'Brien is making a
federal case over the fact that his payments to a teachers' union are
used to support pro-abortion groups and condom distribution programs.
O'Brien says because of his Catholic faith, he cannot support that. So
he's filed suit in federal court. Attorney Gregory Hession told Fox
News, "Mr. O'Brien is not antiunion. He's against paying for a union
that violates his deeply held religious beliefs."

Source: American Life League "Communique" (communique@all.org)
*     *     *     *     *     *     *
"DRUDGE REPORT"  founder, Matt Drudge: a  Pro-Life Hero

Matt Drudge, founder of  the much visited web site: drudgereport.com and a pioneer in internet news services, in an act of courage uncommon in today's pop star climate, gave up a coveted prime time slot on the highly successful FOX NEWS NETWORK over
his unwillingness to censor a planned  viewing of the famous baby finger photo entitled
"The Hand of Hope"; thus qualifying him as a true "Pro-Life Hero".

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
JUSTICE SCALIA: NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO ABORTION

A member of the US Supreme Court has restated his view that there is
no constitutional right to abortion in the United States. In a speech
on Wednesday, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, who was appointed
by President Ronald Regan in 1986, said: "My votes in abortion cases
have nothing to do with my pro-life views. They have to do with the
text of the constitution. And there is nothing, nothing in the
constitution that guarantees the right to an abortion." [The Buffalo
News, 14 March] The US Supreme Court declared a constitutional right
to abortion in the case of Roe v Wade in 1973, although this judgment
could be reversed if future appointees to the Supreme Court share the
views of Justice Scalia.

Source: SPUC (information@spuc.freeserve.co.uk)

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Unborn Baby Saves Mother From Deadly Bullet

Jerusalem -- An Israeli woman who was shot in her ninth month of pregnancy
may well owe her life to the baby girl doctors delivered shortly after the
attack by Palestinian gunmen.

Tamara Fisch-Lifshitz, 33, was traveling in a car near her home in a
Jewish settlement in the West Bank on Monday when shots rang out.

A bullet that pierced her stomach narrowly missed the unborn baby and did
not hit vital organs, which doctors said had been shifted by her
pregnancy.

"If she hadn't been pregnant the injuries would have been a lot more
serious," Dr. Alon Pikarsky told Reuters on Tuesday.

Fisch-Lifshitz, now in stable condition, said on Army Radio from her
hospital bed: "If I had not been pregnant I would not be alive now."

Fisch-Lifshitz's father and a neighbor were killed in the shooting. But
her five-year-old daughter, who sat in the back of the car wearing a
bullet-proof vest, escaped unscathed.

"She asked me to take off the bullet-proof vest because it was heavy and
my father said it would be all right because we are almost home. Then I
heard noises... It turned out to be bullets," Fisch-Lifshitz told Army
Radio.

"I lifted the handbrake and called the emergency number. I looked at my
daughter and didn't see anything wrong although she was covered with a lot
blood that had splashed on her."

Israeli ambulance crews rushed Fisch-Lifshitz to Jerusalem's Hadassah
hospital where doctors delivered the baby in a Caesarean section.

Earlier on Monday, a Palestinian woman gave birth to a girl in a hospital
in the West Bank city of Nablus after she was shot in the shoulder by
Israeli soldiers at a checkpoint while her husband was taking her to
hospital to give birth.

The woman's husband was killed and she named her 3.5 kg (7.7 lb) Fida, or
sacrifice. Her father-in-law, who was also in the car, was seriously
wounded.

A pregnant Palestinian woman was wounded in a similar incident at the same
checkpoint on Sunday.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Unborn Baby Saves Mother From Deadly Bullet
Source:  Reuters; February 26, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Child of Rape Says All Life Has Value

Concord, NH -- Whenever attorney Rebecca Kiessling hears people condemn
abortion except in the case of rape or incest, she feels a deep personal
pain.

She was conceived during a rape. Her birth mother attempted to get an
abortion, but they were illegal at the time and she ultimately decided
against it. Her frightened mother gave up her baby for adoption instead.

Kiessling was adopted by a Jewish couple in Michigan who raised her in
their faith and encouraged her to become a lawyer. Until her late teens,
she had no idea of the circumstances of her birth or the identity of her
birth mother.

Yesterday, Kiessling spoke to about 350 people in the Sacred Heart Church
after most had just completed the annual March for Life from the New
Hampshire State House to the church.

"The biggest message I have is all life has value," Kiessling said.

Kiessling, 32, of Rochester Hills, Mich., is a semi-retired Christian
lawyer, having closed her law office to take care of her family and speak
around the country.

She still does some pro-bono legal work for women and pro-life groups.

She and her husband, Bob, adopted their son Caleb, who often travels with
her. His birth mother was 16 and conceived him at a rave party.

The Kiesslings also adopted a daughter, Cassie, who lived for only 33 days
and died of DiGeorge syndrome, which is a rare group of abnormalities
including recurring infections and heart defects.

"It's so sad that people could look at Cassie and say she wasn't as good,"
Kiessling said.

Kiessling said society too often judges people by whether they are a
burden or benefit without acknowledging the true value of each human life.

"It was an honor to take care of her . . . It was the most important thing
I've ever done," Kiessling said.

Kiessling believes God has a special place in his heart for disabled
children. "Each one of our lives makes a difference and don't let anyone
tell you otherwise," Kiessling said.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Child of Rape Says All Life Has Value
Source:   New Hampshire Sunday News; January 20, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Emmy Winner and Feminists for Life Honorary Chair Patricia Heaton "Revealed"

Patricia Heaton, who is best known for her role as Debra on the CBS hit
comedy series, "Everybody Loves Raymond," was recently interviewed by host
Jules Asner on E! Television's "Revealed."  For the past two years, Heaton
has been awarded an Emmy for Outstanding Actress in a Lead Role in a
Comedy Series.  She also serves as Honorary Chair of Feminists for Life of
America.

Heaton was asked about her first Emmy acceptance speech when she thanked
her mother for "letting me out because life is really amazing."  She
responded, "Since my mother passed away, I wanted to somehow make a
tribute to her. The fact that I was standing on that stage was only
possible because she had me. The greatest gift you can give someone is
their life."

Heaton explained why it is so important for her to be involved as FFL's
Honorary Chair.  "I felt it was important to be a part of solutions for
women who would like to keep the baby, but they have a boyfriend, husband
or parents telling them they are going to cut them out of their lives, so
they have nobody else to turn to."  She added, "It comes down to
supporting people and stepping out and affirming that life is good."

Heaton recognized that "it is a very unpopular position to hold in
Hollywood."  But she also recognized how uncomfortable people are with
abortion.  "There are a lot of people out here who say they are pro-choice
but say `Although I would never have an abortion myself.' So I guess there
are a lot of people who see that being pro-life as being judgmental, and
people don't want to pass judgment on those that had an abortion. It is
very hard to pass judgment because women are put in a very difficult
position, especially if they are not married and they are young."

Reflecting on her own experience she added, "And it is scary.  You know,
when I got pregnant the first time, my husband and I were trying to have
kids. We had planned it.  Got pregnant.  When I found out, I gasped,
because I knew that it was going to change my life irrevocably.  There's
no going back."

Heaton believes that "women who experience an unplanned pregnancy also
deserve unplanned joy."

Like the early American feminists who opposed abortion, Feminists for Life
works to systematically eliminate the root causes that drive women to
abortion by facilitating practical solutions.  For more information about
Feminists for Life, visit their website at www.feministsforlife.org.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Emmy Winner and Feminists for Life Honorary Chair PatriciaHeaton "Revealed"
Source:   Feminists for Life; January 25, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
National Ministries Offer Women Post-Abortion Help

Pittsburgh, PA -- Georgette Forney wipes away a tear as she visits
Rachel's Garden at Calvary Cemetery in Hazelwood, Pennsylvania. Forney,
who aborted her child when she was 16, went through a post-abortion
healing group many years later and now offers such ministry to other women
who have had abortions.

Places such as Rachel's Garden, where mothers can place a memorial stone
with the child's first name and the year of the abortion, provide a
tangible way for women to remember their aborted babies and mourn them.

She sees the child as a girl, but she has not placed a stone engraved
"Elizabeth -- 1976" in this special section of Calvary Cemetery in
Hazelwood.

Six years ago, Forney, 41, of Sewickley, Pennsylvania did hold a memorial
service after completing a program for post-abortion healing. Now she
offers online support at www.pregnancycenters.org to others who regret an
abortion.

"Women are feeling pain, but they suffer in silence. It's a forbidden
grief," she said.

Pro-life advocates have offered support to women who have had abortions
since at least the early 1980s. The goal is to grieve, express remorse and
move on. Most of the groups are Christian, and the best known -- Project
Rachel -- is Catholic.

No one keeps count of those who have sought help from post-abortion
healing ministries. By all estimates, the number is small compared with
the more than 1 million abortions done annually since abortion was
legalized 29 years ago this week.

Founded in 1984, Project Rachel is in 145 Catholic dioceses. Its name
comes from the Biblical account of King Herod slaughtering babies in an
attempt to kill the infant Jesus: "A voice is heard in Ramah, weeping and
great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children and refusing to be
comforted, because they are no more." (Matt. 2:18)

The Catholic Diocese of Pittsburgh has had Project Rachel since 1990. Its
mainstays are a telephone line and e-mail address for confidential
conversation and referrals to therapists, support groups and specially
trained priests.

Sue Rauscher, director of the diocesan Department of Social Awareness,
answers the e-mail and the phone.

Most calls concern an abortion that took place seven to 10 years earlier.
Most are from women who have had abortions, but some are boyfriends,
husbands or parents. Rauscher works with 40 to 60 clients annually.

Some callers pour out regret for an abortion, others aren't sure what's
bothering them, she said. Those with an immediate crisis, such as an
addiction, suicide threats or a crumbling marriage, are sent to
professional therapists. Some want to see a priest. Others aren't
Catholic.

The Rev. Frank Almade, diocesan secretary for social concerns, is one of
15 Pittsburgh priests who work with Project Rachel. Apart from that, he
said, only two women in 20 years had ever confessed an abortion to him.

Women who confess an abortion already feel bad about it, he said.

"In 99 to 100 percent of these cases, you don't need to tell people that
they've done wrong or committed a terrible sin. What they need to hear is
God's mercy," Almade said.

Forney never considered any option but abortion when she became pregnant
in her junior year of high school. She didn't want to disappoint her
parents. She thought a baby would ruin her chances of marriage. Her older
siblings helped her arrange and conceal an abortion.

She was not raised in any faith. She was never told that abortion was
wrong, but it didn't feel right.

The next morning "I told myself that what happened yesterday was just a
bad dream. It didn't happen."

She married at 20. She told herself that she chose not to have children
because her husband already had three. But the deeper reason was that she
was afraid to revisit her pregnancy, Forney said.

In 1982, they became Christians at St. Stephen's Episcopal Church. The
national Episcopal Church supports abortion, but her parish was opposed.
When the pastor spoke of abortion as killing, "I would just cringe," she
said.

In 1989, her faith gave her the courage to have a child, Rebekah. She
started to think that the problem she had fixed in 1976 was Rebekah's
sister. The idea was so painful that she repressed it as much as she
could. She believes that stress was why she developed ulcerative colitis.

When another woman in her Bible study spoke of remorse over her own
abortion, Forney almost spat at her: "Get over it. I had one, too. It's
OK."

In 1995, she came across her high school yearbook. "I opened it up, and
all I could see was my baby," she said. Overwhelmed with feelings of loss,
she called the woman she had told to "get over it."

"She came over and cried with me and wept with me," Forney said.

Forney spent 13 weeks with two other women working through Forgiven and
Set Free, a Bible study for women who have had abortions. Her colitis
began to heal.

Clinical social worker Ann Depner was surprised at how often an abortion
seemed to be tangled up with the marital strife, depression and other
issues people brought to her. Until she saw that pattern, abortion was not
an issue she cared about, she said.

Now, as director of family services at Catholic Charities, she oversees
Rachel's Vineyard, a 14-week support group for post-abortion healing. It
is offered free of charge twice a year and is limited to eight
participants. A weekend retreat version will be offered for the first time
in the fall.

The women spend the early weeks talking and praying about the
circumstances that led to their abortions. Later they discuss their
feelings about the child who would have been. Most have some intuition of
the baby's sex.

Depner believes the remorse is natural and not only the result of being
raised in a church that opposes abortion. Many of the women are not
Catholic and some are from backgrounds that support abortion, she said.

Amy, who did not want her real name used, came to Rachel's Vineyard on
impulse, which is the way she said she had three abortions from three
relationships two decades ago. She was in her 20s, was focused on a career
and was careless with contraception.

She was raised Catholic but can't recall hearing abortion mentioned in
church. She did not feel guilty when she had her abortions.

A decade later, she married and started attending Mass again. She was not
overwhelmed with remorse. But three years ago, something inexplicable
moved her to respond to a bulletin notice for Rachel's Vineyard. The group
became a safe place to unpack thoughts and feelings she had never admitted
to herself.

"There is not one iota of judgment or guilt-throwing in that program," she
said.

"I think they helped me to surface my own guilt and they helped me get
past it. I think I had carried a lot of guilt, but I lived with it by
burying it. So, instead of making me feel guilty, it was almost the
opposite."

The memorial Mass was heartbreaking and necessary, she said.

"I had never, never thought about those children until that program. Now I
pray for them and to them. They are real to me now, as painful as that is.
I finally acknowledged them as human beings."

Rachel's Vineyard gave her the courage she needed to change careers and
start her own business, Amy said. But she is apolitical about abortion.
She wants to help women who have had one, but is not interested in making
it illegal.

Forney took a different path. She is executive director of the National
Organization of Episcopalians for Life, which seeks to reverse the
denomination's support for legal abortion. She estimates that 25 percent
of women in leadership of the pro-life movement have had abortions.

She began to speak about her abortion after Rebekah found an essay she had
written about it. Her daughter urged her to go public.

At last year's March for Life in Washington, D.C., Forney carried a sign
that she intends to carry again Tuesday: "My biggest mistake was having an
abortion."

"I couldn't believe all the people who came up to me and said, 'I wish I
had the courage to carry that sign,' " she said.

Please help women you know who have had an abortion and are greiving over
it. Refer them to http://www.pregnancycenters.org to contact someone who
can help.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   National Ministries Offer Women Post-Abortion Help
Source:   Pittsburgh Post-Gazette; January 20, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Teen Wins Fight to Wear Pro-Life T-Shirt in California

Littlerock, CA -- Most would agree that clothes are an important factor in
the lives of fashion models.  But to Samantha Gallardo, a model in the Los
Angeles area and a senior at Littlerock High School in Littlerock,
California, the clothes she wore became a constitutional issue.

Samantha, an ardent believer that abortion is the intentional killing of
unborn children, was told by a school official that she could no longer
wear shirts to school with pro-life messages such as "Abortion is
Killing," "Abortion is Wrong," and "I'm Pro-Life".

Samantha sought the assistance of the Thomas More Law Center, a national
public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan.  Law Center
attorneys sent a letter to the school district explaining Samantha's
constitutional right to advance her pro-life views at school and demanded
that she be permitted to wear her pro-life clothing.  As a result of the
efforts of the Thomas More Law Center, Samantha has resumed wearing her
pro-life clothing to school.

"Expressing my pro-life views are important to me," said Samantha.  "I'm
glad I took the steps I did to ensure that I can freely wear my pro-life
shirts to school.  I make the pro-life shirts myself and distribute them
to other students who are wearing them to school without any problems from
the school."

Samantha's senior project deals with the meaning of being pro-life.  She
and her sister have even written a pro-life song and Samantha plans to
sing it at the school's talent show.

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in
Ann Arbor, Michigan, defends and promotes religious freedom, time-honored
family values, and the sanctity of human life through education,
litigation, and related activities.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Teen Wins Fight to Wear Pro-Life T-Shirt in California
Source:   Thomas More Law Center; January 21, 2002

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Lutherans for Life Holds National Convention

Detroit, MI -- "Living Under the Cross" was the theme as more than 350
Lutherans gathered from across the United States and Canada for the 19th
annual convention of Lutherans For Life (LFL).  LFL, the only
inter-Lutheran pro-life organization in the nation, is based in Nevada, IA
with 15 State Federations, 157 local Chapters, and 657 Life Ministry
Coordinators nationwide.

The Rev. John Nunes uplifted and challenged the gathering in a keynote
address on "The Theology of the Cross."

Nunes, author and pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church in Dallas, TX, shared
an excerpt from his book, "Voices from the City," that said, "Since human
life is a gift of God, it is inherently holy."

"How we live together, then, and how we preserve the inherent holiness of
human life is fundamental to our confession of faith.  It is also a
bottom-line principle of diversity. Treating some people as ostensibly
dispensable is contrary to the will of God [as explained in 1 Peter 3:9].
The notion of idly standing by and letting some people live like hell, in
a human hell, only to die and go to hell is a faith question."

Rev. Nunes continued by saying that, "our lives are not merely biological
or social or political.  How we share life is primarily about theology; it
is a God issue.  Life, from conception to natural death, is a gift from
God.  And God cares about the poor."

In referring to the approximately 33 million blacks in the United States,
Nunes explained that "without abortion, which has been legal since 1973,
there would be nearly 50 million African-Americans.  Some protesters have
called this biomedical genocide." He explained that even though blacks
make up only about 10% of the population, over 33% of abortions are
performed on minority women.

Earlier in a pre-convention workshop, LFL Executive Director, Rev. Dr.
James I. Lamb, and LFL President, Linda D. Bartlett, shared the "Mission,
Message, and Manner" of Lutherans For Life. Beginning with the mission,
"to witness to the sanctity of human life through education based on the
Word of God," Dr. Lamb explained that, "If we don't use the Word of God to
carry out our mission, we won't be ABLE to carry out our mission."  Being
based on the Word of God "is the defining factor of who we are and what we
do!" he said.

Mrs. Bartlett explained that the "real battle is a battle of worldviews."
She also said it was very important that pro-life people use the proper
manner as they speak the truth in love and called on the members of LFL to
love*patiently, kindly, humbly & forgivingly, truthfully, protectively,
trustingly & hopefully, and always.

Dr. Richard Eyer, who serves as Assistant Professor of Philosophy at
Concordia University Wisconsin, Director of Counseling, and Director of
the Concordia Bioethics Institute told the convention that "Now is the
time to speak and live the Theology of the Cross that helps people see God
in the midst of their suffering."

Dr. Eyer said the words of pro-life people against:

abortion, assisted suicide and euthanasia, reproductive technologies that
contradict procreation, the use of aborted fetal tissue and human embryos
for research...

...must now become, equally, words of healing for:

millions of women who are suffering the pain of post abortion syndrome,
for the sick and elderly who are suffering what they perceive to be the
meaninglessness of their lives, for those couples suffering the pain of
childlessness, and those whose hope for a cure of their diseases is
founded on the results of this research and not on Christ.

A panel discussion was held on "Theology, Ethics, Medicine, and Law Under
the Cross" with Dr. Eyer; Dr. Mark Blocher, executive director of the
Center for Biblical Bioethics in Grand Rapids, the Center for Biblical
Values, Health Intervention Services, the Alpha Women's Center, and
Baptists for Life; Rev. Paul Clark, pastor of St. Paul Lutheran Church in
Fowler, MI; Karen Rehder, M.D, a gynecologist in private practice in
Pittsburgh, PA; and Wesley Smith, a noted lecturer, public speaker, and
author.

Among a wide variety of questions and answers, it was pointed out how key
language is to the debate on life issues. For example, the term
"vegetative state" should never be used in describing a human being
because a human being is never a "vegetable."  The use of such a term
deprives individuals of their basic humanity and therefore their right to
life.

In addition to workshops by panel members, convention attendees were also
able to attend workshops by Concordia Students For Life; Grace Kern,
licensed social worker and a member in good standing with the American
Association of Christian Counselors and director of LFL's Healing Hearts
post-abortion ministry; Brian Young, author, founder and director of
Creation Instruction Association, and principal of a Christian school in
Juniata, NE; and Lance Wilcox, former pro-life aide to Representative
Henry Hyde.

In her closing address to the convention, Building a Culture of Life,
Linda Bartlett said, "LFL models a culture of life. It is men leading the
way to safety.  It is women nurturing relationships.  It is husbands and
wives building on Jesus. It is fathers and mothers loving children ... we
build a culture of life by living as if there will be a tomorrow and a
future to carry on ... all God wants from us is to be faithful.  To stand
our watch.  To be at our post ... No matter if we are facing terrorism, an
unwed pregnancy, terminal illness, or weariness in the pro-life mission
field, God gives us what we need-when we need it-to care for life."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Lutherans for Life Holds National Convention
Source:   Lutherans for Life; November 14, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
How One Patient Changed a Doctor's Life Forever

St Louis, MO -- Dr. Anthony Levatino credits one patient who had
tremendous perseverance and faith with helping change his career path.

Levatino is a former abortion practitioner who spoke to about 400 people
at a Vitae Society dinner Tuesday evening at Drury Lodge. He talked about
his career and the change his life took after he stopped performing
abortions.

Levatino told how one patient, a woman named Susan, spent eight years
telling him that Jesus loved him and that performing abortions wasn't part
of God's plan for his life. She would visit his practice every year for a
physical and annual exam and then deliver that message. Sometimes it came
in cards or with a plate of brownies, but Levatino always tried to ignore
it.

It took eight years for her message to hit home.

Levatino had worked hard to avoid the topic -- even at home with his wife,
Cecelia. The couple rarely spoke about abortion or the effect it had on
their relationship.

But the couple said there came a time when the issue couldn't be ignored
any longer. They had suffered through a tragedy -- the death of their
young daughter -- and that helped them realize what effect abortion had on
their family.

Levatino spoke about starting out in practice seeking what every doctor
wants: happy and healthy patients. He had no qualms about performing
abortions because he felt it supported a woman's right to choose. After
his daughter's death, he and his wife drifted further apart and never
grieved over their loss or the irony of Levatino's work.

"He had gotten into this blame game," Cecelia Levatino said. "He would
blame the nurse for scheduling it or the patient for getting pregnant."

Eventually, she confronted him and said if he had problems with abortions,
it must be his fault.

"The pressure builds and builds and that was the first time we'd talked
about it," he said. Three months later, he told his partners he wouldn't
do the second-trimester abortions. "I said I'd do the little ones but when
you feel in your heart you're killing babies, then it doesn't make any
difference how big they are."

Another three months passed before he stopped performing abortions
altogether.

Now the Levatinos are involved in a number of pro-life outreaches and Dr.
Levatino serves as the medical consultant for Pregnancy Centers Online
(www.pregnancycenters.org), a web site that helps women in various crisis
or unplanned pregnancy situations.

The couple spoke about the need for more people who can make a difference.
The story of Susan's devotion shows the effect of one person who works and
acts in faith, they said.

Carl Landwehr, president of the Vitae Society in Missouri, asked members
to consider their role in helping spread the message of the movement and
to help women choose life over abortion. "We should not be a society to
send women to abortion clinics," he said. "We should honor them for being
heroes and for the sacrifices they made."

The event serves as a fund-raising campaign for the organization, which
airs advertisements on local television stations. The goal for Tuesday's
benefit was to raise $60,000 to fund commercials.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   How One Patient Changed a Doctor's Life Forever
Source:   Southeast Missourian; August 30, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Another Memorial to the Unborn Dedicated in Oregon

Newburg, OR -- -- Five years ago, Athlynn Reeves, former director of the
HEART counseling program for Pregnancy Resource Centers of Greater
Portland, visited the National Memorial for the Unborn in Chattanooga,
Tenn.  She was deeply moved by it and decided the Northwest needed
something similar to honor the memory of babies lost to miscarriage and
abortion and to be a place of peace and healing for the families of those
children.

Through thick and thin, the Northwest Memorial for the Unborn (NWMU)
Steering Committee has been committed to searching for a location for the
memorial.

This month the vision becomes a reality with the dedication of the
Northwest Memorial for the Unborn at a Newberg location.

A similar project already under way at Friends Cemetery in Newberg.  This
publicity caught the attention of the NWMU committee.

After meeting with representatives of the cemetery board, the NWMU
Steering Committee prayerfully decided to partner with Friends Cemetery in
expanding the vision to enable many more women and men to find comfort and
healing.  Thus, the official dedication of the memorial is planned for
Saturday, Aug. 18 at 10 a.m. at the cemetery on Everest Road just off
Highway 99W in Newberg.  A testimony will be given by Steve VanHoff and
songs of praise will be led by Larry Gadbaugh.

The memorial stone will have room for 1,000 plaques dedicated to the
unborn.  People wishing to memorialize their aborted or miscarried babies
may contact Pregnancy Resource Centers' confidential voicemail at
503-22-HEART.

The HEART staff will mail an informational brochure outlining the
procedure for purchasing a plaque to be affixed on the memorial.  The cost
for each plaque is $35.

HEART (Healing Encouragement for Abortion Related Trauma) is a 14-week
Bible study.  The program ministers to hurting men and women, giving
individuals a safe, confidential enironment for them to grieve the loss of
their children and deal with past hurts from an abortion experiences.
Everyone who enters and graduates from a HEART/Healing A Fathers Heart
group are given information regarding this memorial site and can order a
plaque if they wish.  The site is available for anyone interested.

The NWMU Steering Committee members in-clude: Chairperson, Athlynn Reeves,
Julie Johnson, Lisa Heacock, Dr. Harold Vic, Pastor Tom Hurt, Glenda
Bigalky, Dr. Fred Cowan, Bob Hartford, Diane Meyer, and Officer Jim
Seymour.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Another Memorial to the Unborn Dedicated in Oregon
Source:   Christian News Northwest; August Issue

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Memorial in St. Louis Will Honor Unborn Children

St. Louis, MO -- They weren't born. They weren't held in their mothers'
arms. Most weren't named. They have no gravesites to visit.

They are the babies who have been lost, for whatever reason, in early
pregnancy.

There is no acknowledgment that they ever existed, but that situation --
for those parents who wish to participate -- will change when a
non-denominational "Memorial of Names" is erected in the local St. Louis
Cemetery next spring.

Sponsored by the Social Concerns Committee of Holy Name Catholic Church
and by the St. Louis Cemetery Board, the memorial will include a tall
black granite slab with flanking slabs of Georgia gray granite. The
memorial, most of which is being donated by Henry and Henry Monuments
here, will have the inscribed words "I will never forget you" followed by
the first names of those previously unrecognized children.

Anyone who has lost a child to miscarriage or suffered the pain of an
abortion and who mourns that child is invited to give a first name to the
baby and the name will be etched at no charge into the granite.

There is another such monument in western Kentucky. That one was erected
in October 1994 at Resurrection Cemetery east of Owensboro on Kentucky 54.
Like the memorial that will be dedicated at St. Louis Cemetery here on
Mother's Day or Memorial Day 2000, the Daviess County marker includes no
last names. Parents remain anonymous.

Both monuments were inspired by the Catholic Church's "Project Rachel," a
confidential healing national ministry for men and women who have been
touched by the abortion experience. The Owensboro Diocese opted to expand
Project Rachel for the Memorial of Names and include babies lost to
miscarriage.

Carmen Andrew, who has spearheaded the memorial project here, reports that
an image of the biblical Rachel will be on the monument. Jeremiah 31:
15-17 relates, "Rachel mourns for her children; she refuses to be consoled
because her children are no more. Thus says the Lord: Cease your cries of
mourning. Wipe the tears from your eyes. The sorrow you have shown shall
have its reward. There is hope for your future."

Andrew said Tammy Neel, a member of the Social Concerns committee, has
designed the memorial that is expected to have many names already
inscribed at the time of its spring dedication, with other names to be
periodically added.

Two of the names that will be on the monument are "Beverly" and "Barbara."
They were twins Andrew's mother lost to miscarriage in the 1930s. Andrew
said as soon as her mother had learned she was carrying twins, she named
them and when they were lost, she grieved for them until her own death 30
years later.

The Rev. Ed Bradley of Holy Name was involved in the Owensboro, Kentucky
memorial project and says the time for this one has come. So many women,
he said, are expected to pretend their pregnancies never happened and they
should be able to mourn and have that pregnancy acknowledged.

"Just putting a name for the baby on a monument is a way of saying, 'Yes,
this child was real,'" Bradley said.

The memorial will be in a part of the cemetery that as yet is undeveloped.
Currently, that site, which runs parallel to Green Street, is being used
as a vegetable garden by a number of residents in the vicinity. After the
growing season, it will be cleared and in coming months will be home not
only to the memorial, but to a mausoleum, benches, and flowering trees.

The entrance will be off Green Street, and there will be a circular
driveway through it. Skinner and Groves, a local architectural firm, is
doing design work for the location.

Because it is easier for Henry and Henry to inscribe names before the
monument is erected, those who wish to place a name on the memorial are
asked to call Holy Name in St. Louis at 826-2096. They will not be asked
to reveal their identity.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Memorial in St. Louis Will Honor Unborn Children
Source:   Henderson (KY) Gleaner; September 16, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Knowing Her Unborn Baby Will Die, Mother Choose Life

Philadelphia, PA -- Marcie Macolino is carrying a baby she knows will
die.Maybe in childbirth, more likely in the first week, almost certainly
within three months. The baby is due Thanksgiving.

Marcie knew early in her pregnancy that this baby -- whom she and her
husband have already named Abigail -- would die. Yet Marcie always planned
to carry this baby to term, to give Abigail what life she could.

The mother of three lovely children, Marcie has already lost three
pregnancies -- all for different reasons. And all different still from the
chromosome disorder Trisomy 18 that will kill Abigail.

Marcie also happens to be Dr. Marcie E. Macolino, a much-loved
pediatrician who daily treats and nurtures thriving newborns, all the time
knowing the baby inside her will struggle and perhaps suffer from the
first breath.

Marcie, 35, thinks of her work, as well as her mothering, as a calling
from Jesus. Though she weeps at home and mourns for the baby yet to be
born and has become too well acquainted with grief, she does not question
God or lose her faith.

"My whole life has been turned over to God," she said Wednesday afternoon
at the kitchen table in her Germantown home. "He's the one that made me,
that saved me. I consider it a privilege, whatever it is He wants me to
do. This underlines not only why I'm a pediatrician, but this pregnancy as
well."

Marcie's mother and father were missionaries, first in Kenya, then in
American cities, settling in Philadelphia. Her father died when she was
12. By ninth grade, she knew God's plan for her. "I really felt called to
be a pediatrician," she said.

She met her husband, Jerry, at church. They consider themselves Disciples
of Jesus, a form of evangelical Christians. They really got to know one
another in 1988, working together on a house in West Philadelphia for
Habitat for Humanity. She works two and a half days a week as one of four
physicians with Mount Airy Pediatrics. He works the other two and a half
days as a computer consultant. They school their children at home.

Their first child is Sarah, now 8, and beautiful, who can play Beethoven's
Ode To Joy on the piano and who consoled her father, even cooked him
dinner the other day when he collapsed in tears over Abigail.

Their second child is Thomas, now 6, a concrete thinker who recently said
to his mother, as she tucked him into bed, "So, this kid's going to die?"

After Thomas, she became pregnant with twins who were in the same embryo
sac and died at 13 weeks.

Next came a boy who died when her placenta separated from the uterus. She
went into labor and delivered him at 17 weeks. Jerry held his son in his
palm. He was perfect, seven inches long, seven ounces in weight.

Third came a boy who had Down syndrome whose heart stopped beating in
utero at 17 weeks.

Marcie asked friends and family, she prayed to God: "Am I crazy to keep
having children?" The answer she heard and felt was: "No."

Soon she became pregnant again, this time with Peter, now an adorable
one-year-old with curly blond hair. Peter, they believed, was a gift from
God. Marcie and Jerry thought the heartache was past, at last. "There's
really a sense of moving on," Marcie said, "when you have a healthy baby
after these three losses."

They wanted to have one last child, maybe another girl. This spring,
Marcie became pregnant with Abigail.

Ten weeks into her pregnancy, Marcie was bleeding.

In an ultrasound test, doctors saw a big pocket of fluid under the skin
around the baby's neck. That suggested a chromosome defect. Doctors wanted
to give Marcie tests to determine exactly what was wrong.

She declined. "We decided whatever the information was, we weren't going
to do anything," she said. "So no further testing."

Over the next several weeks, the situation became more grave. Marcie never
doubted she would keep the baby, but decided that as a physician and a
mother, she needed to prepare for what was to come.

Doctors did an amniocentesis, a check for chromosomal defects. On July 13,
at 21 weeks, a doctor called Marcie at home. "It's Trisomy 18," the doctor
said.

"Is it a boy or girl?" Marcie asked. "It's a female," the doctor said.

According to a medical textbook in Dr. Macolino's office, "Babies with the
Trisomy 18 syndrome are usually feeble and have a limited capacity for
survival. Fifty percent die within the first week and many of the
remaining die in the next 12 months. Only five to 10 percent survive the
first year as severely mentally defective individuals."

>From the very instant her specialists determined the baby had a fatal
disorder, she said, "their words became incredibly dehumanizing."

"I was appalled because he was still offering me the option to terminate
my baby," she said of her doctor. "My calling is to children whether my
own or others. I consider that to include unborn children. I knew that
ending the life of any child was not an option for me."

Her midwife supported her. "You can give your baby the gift of carrying
it," she told Marcie.

In her Mount Airy office, Dr. Macolino has an obvious rapport and devotion
to children. She switches seamlessly between baby talk with a 3-year-old,
"Hey pumpkin! Big breaths! Big. Big. Big," and adult conversation with the
parent: "She's got some stuff going on in her lungs. I hear some wheezing
now."

At work, she shows no hint of her grief. Her focus is entirely on her
patients.

"When I'm at the office, my mission is to provide medical care for them,"
she said. "When I'm home, that's when I cry and cry and cry."

She is now 28 weeks along. "It feels like forever," she said. "This is the
eternal pregnancy."

Two weeks ago, at her request, a letter from Mount Airy Pediatrics was
sent to hundreds of families. "Dr. Macolino will be out on indefinite
maternity leave after Thanksgiving," it said. "Unfortunately, her little
girl has Trisomy 18, a genetic disorder, and is not expected to live long
after birth. We hope you will support her with your thoughts and prayers."

Dr. Macolino couldn't bear the idea of parents' asking every day, "Aren't
you excited?"

"I did it for me and for them," she said.

Parents have responded in many ways. One asked to pray for her, right in
the examination room.

"I was devastated," said Iris Carter of Collegeville, mother of Ashleigh,
3, and Jordyn, 1, in the office Wednesday for checkups. "I think she's
very brave. A lot of people probably would have aborted. Knowing the
baby's going to be born and not live very long, a lot of people wouldn't
continue the pregnancy. I admire her for doing so."

Marcie's colleagues at Mount Airy Pediatrics respect her decision and feel
sad for her.

"You don't want to see it happen to anybody, but to Marcie even less,"
said Jennifer Louis-Jadotte, the office receptionist and a good friend.
"She loves children so much and what she does so much."

Abigail has been vigorous in the womb. "Sometimes I enjoy that," Marcie
says. "And sometimes it makes me feel sad about what we're going to lose."
She is familiar with grief and has been since she lost her father when she
was just a girl. She knows it will come in waves, and when the waves come,
it will devastate her.

Being a doctor, she also knows - more than her husband can imagine - the
demands and pains of a severely disabled, special-needs baby. "I know,"
she says. I've seen them - at all hours."

Jerry knows he can never feel exactly as his wife does. "I don't carry
her," he says of Abigail. "I don't feel her kicking."

He said he had tried to imagine losing one of his three children to
anticipate what it might feel like to lose Abigail. "We pray for her to
have limited amount of pain and discomfort," he says. "My first goal is to
make her comfortable. The second goal would be to make her last as long as
she can, but not at the expense of the first goal.

"I've wanted this baby as much as any," he said. "I'm already starting to
miss her - which may sound funny - even though I haven't met her yet."

Marcie chose the baby's name. It means "my father's joy."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Knowing Her Unborn Baby Will Die, Mother Choose Life
Source:   Philadelphia Inquirer; September 2, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
"I don't want to walk again at the expense of an aborted baby!"

Carlos Brito is a student in computer science. He's also a
paraplegic and a wheelchair user.  EWTN featured him
commenting on stem cell research.  Sitting in his
wheelchair, Carlos told EWTN, "I don't want to walk again at
the expense of an aborted baby! How can people want such a
thing!"

Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 01:30:36 -0700
From: "SueW" <gswidemark@home.com>
To: "Cinlife_mailing list" <cinlife@cin.org>
Subject: One man's take on stem cell research

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Heroic Mother saves Daughter

Dear Dr. Laura,

If I held the beliefs of the far left, there would be one less beautiful
wonderful child in this world.

Eleven years ago, my wife and I found out we were expecting twins. We were
22 years old at the time. Things went well until about 4 months into her
pregnancy. During a routine visit, the doctor could not find one of the
twins' heartbeats. Further investigation confirmed that the twin had died.
The other twin however, was healthy, although struggling. (Deep breath.it
still hurts.)

For the following two and a half months my wife bravely and stoically
carried our living and our dead child together in her womb in the face of
predictions that she would be poisoned by the twin that died and that the
other twin, if she even made it, would be severely brain damaged. Killing
our child was alluded to and outright recommended by a couple of medical
"professionals" we had to see.

At 28 weeks, our twins were delivered by emergency C-section because my wife
's body was trying to miscarry the dead twin. Our daughter Coryn had
absolutely no brain damage whatsoever and was only in the hospital for a
month before she was strong enough to come home. We had a funeral for
Elizabeth, the twin who died.

Coryn is now 11 years old, makes straight A's in school and is beautiful. If
she had been brain damaged and was confined to a wheelchair - whatever her
condition, she would still be just as beautiful to us.

I always respected my wife, but after experiencing what we went through and
seeing how she behaved, I have been in absolute awe of her. She was entirely
selfless for the sake of our child.

The story of my Coryn shows that no one has the right to determine whether a
human has the right to be born.

Thanks for being a beacon in a dark world, Dr. Laura.

Mark
http://www.drlaura.com/letters/index.html?mode=view&tile=1&id=970

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Mom Who Refused Abortion Has Son Save Her Life

Phoenix, AZ -- Nearly two decades ago, Robyn Bowen refused when a doctor
said she needed an abortion to save her life. Today, her 19-year-old son
will give her a kidney and a chance to keep living.

Bowen was three months pregnant when a doctor at the Mayo Clinic in
Rochester, Minn., warned that her unborn baby would drain important
nutrients and put a strain on her failing kidneys. After 12 hours of
induced labor, Bowen delivered a healthy baby, Brandon Clute, three weeks
early.

"We are going back to the same place that told us he would kill me and now
he is giving me life again," said Bowen, who grew up in Mesa, Arizona.

Bowen, 42, will be in a room today next to her son at the Mayo Clinic as
doctors make a small incision below Clute's navel and remove one of his
kidneys. The organ will then be placed inside his mother. It will be her
third kidney transplant; operations in 1985 and 1989 proved unsuccessful.

Clute is sacrificing an organ to free his mother from a dialysis machine
and give the two a chance to make up for the many times they were
separated by her illness.

For more than 15 years, Bowen has relied on the machine to withdraw blood
from her body and rinse it of toxins before pumping it back through her
veins. She and her only child hope today's five-hour operation frees her
from the three-hour, three-day-a-week regimen of being hooked up to a
machine.

But Bowen was reluctant to take a kidney from her son when he first
offered it at 14. Clute would have to wait until he turned 18 to be
considered, which was a relief to Bowen.

"I hoped he would forget," Bowen said. "You never want your child to go
through any kind of pain, especially for you." Clute didn't forget. At 5
he thought it was cool to watch when he accompanied his mother for her
dialysis treatment. In later years, he began to understand his mother's
pain. He missed her during her numerous hospitalizations. He hated
watching his mother hooked up to the machine when she received treatment
at home.

"I watched her get weaker and weaker and wasting away," Clute said. "I
knew someday I would have to save my mom's life."

Bowen tried her best to disguise her pain and be there for her son as much
as possible. She attended community college and worked processing medical
bills for a doctor while raising her son as a single mother.

But it was difficult to hide the scars left by needles that drew blood
from her arm. Those treatments once brought about a blood clot that numbed
her hand and robbed her ability to move her fingers, which she recovered
from after three years.

She was still receiving treatment in 1994 when she met her future husband,
Stephen, then a dialysis technician at an outpatient center in Scottsdale.
Stephen Bowen fell in love with his patient and two years later they
married. He would eventually treat his wife from their home while
continuing to treat patients at work.

The strain of working 10- to 14-hour days treating patients and then his
wife soon wore on Stephen Bowen. It was difficult to watch patients who
had become friends die and constantly be reminded of his wife's fragile
hold on life. In July, he left his job and joined the medical records
division at Scottsdale Health Care Osborn.

"We hadn't really spent much time together and when we did see each other,
she was hooked up to the machine," Stephen Bowen said. "The machine set
the tone for everything."

Robyn Bowen also has found strength in her faith and received financial
and emotional support from friends. Her church, East Valley Bible Church
in Gilbert, has donated thousands for her travel and medical costs and
continues to hold fund-raisers, including one last weekend that raised
$2,900.

Last year Bowen got to fulfill a promise when she recovered enough from a
serious illness to attend her son's graduation at Dobson High School.

Now Bowen hopes her son's kidney helps her make up for lost time.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Mom Who Refused Abortion Has Son Save Her Life
Source:   Arizona Republic; May 31, 2001


*     *     *     *     *     *     *

* Donato Dalrymple is the man who rescued Elian Gonzalez
from the Atlantic Ocean. He now speaks up for the right to
life. "The most vulnerable of all are the unborn," he said.
"Just like I could not rightly ignore that boy in the inner
tube, so none of us can ignore our brothers and sisters in
danger of abortion. We all need to speak up for them and try
to save them."

Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2001 11:28:35 -0700
From: "SueW" <gswidemark@home.com>
To: "Cinlife_mailing list" <cinlife@cin.org>
Subject: more PFL

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Women who chose life reflect on what might not have been

Without the CPC, "My Baby Wouldn't Be Here"

Dallas, TX -- Tessa Malaspina was 22 years old when the cheap pregnancy
test she bought turned positive. "I was going to have an abortion,"
remembers Ms. Malaspina, a blonde club dancer who once was heavily into
drinking and drugs: "I was having way too much fun partying."

When her mom convinced Ms. Malaspina to stop by the Dallas Pregnancy
Resource Center, Ms. Malaspina warned her: "It will not change my mind."
She'd already had one abortion; three months pregnant, she climbed the
stairs to the CPC's ultrasound room, determined to have another one.

"I didn't want to see it, but at the same time I didn't think it would
matter," she says of the pending sonogram. "But once I saw it was a moving
person with a heartbeat, I couldn't do it," Ms. Malaspina said.

"I couldn't even think about [abortion] again. I never realized how
advanced they were so early.... They give you information in school and
stuff, but never enough. If I hadn't have seen it, I wouldn't have changed
my mind. I don't know how anyone could go though with an abortion after
seeing an ultrasound."

The day she decided to keep her second child, she quit dancing, smoking,
and taking drugs.

"It totally changed my life around," she says, pausing to tend blue-eyed
son Riley, 6 months old. Ms. Malaspina, who now works full- time as a bill
collector, says her mom helps her with the baby: "It's hard," she says of
being a single mom, "but I wouldn't have it any other way."

Beverly Wright, 29, was five months pregnant when she stepped through the
glass door to Dallas Pregnancy Resource Center, seeking a free pregnancy
test "to make sure." She had just lost her job and her car, and was also
behind on her rent. "I had an option to pay my rent or get an abortion,"
she remembers.

After the pregnancy test confirmed her pregnancy, Ms. Wright's CPC
counselor asked if she would also like an ultrasound. "I didn't know what
to expect," Ms. Wright confesses. "But my No. 1 choice was abortion, so I
wasn't scared."

When the picture popped up on the screen, Ms. Wright began crying. "I was
shocked," she says. "They were all telling me, 'Look at her move! She's so
pretty! Do you see the hand?' That's what did it. I saw what it really
wasmy baby. It gave me a change of heart."

Ms. Wright took home the black-and-white sonogram photos and kept them on
her dresser in a white envelope marked simply "Baby."

"It made me accept that I had her. And it made me fall in love with her,"
says Ms. Wright, now the proud mother of smiling 14-month-old Tia. "I
still have those pictures. If I had never seen the ultrasound, my baby
wouldn't be here," she says, shuddering. "From the bottom of my heart,
she's the best thing that ever happened to me."

Now Ms. Wright spends every day with Tia working as a live-in employee in
a health care home. What would she say to other abortion-minded clients?
"Come get a sonogram, and see what you've got inside. It'll change
everything."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Without the CPC, "My Baby Wouldn't Be Here"
Source:   World Magazine; June 16th Issue

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Jane Roe Takes Roe. V. Wade Back To Court
June 01, 2001

(CNSNews.com) - Nearly three decades after the Supreme Court
legalized abortion nationwide, the original plaintiff in the
landmark Roe v. Wade case is urging a federal court to
reconsider the 1973 Supreme Court decision.

"My case was wrongfully decided and has caused great harm to
the women and children of our nation," said Norma McCorvey,
better known as "Jane Roe." McCorvey had a change of heart
about abortion in the years since the Supreme Court ruling.

McCorvey and Sandra Cano (of the Roe companion case Doe v.
Bolton) filed a friend-of-the-court brief in a class action
lawsuit on Thursday in the federal 3rd Circuit Court of
Appeals.

McCorvey and Cano want their respective cases overturned so
that the class action suit against abortion providers can
proceed.

The two are represented by the Texas Justice Foundation, a
San Antonio-based public interest law firm. Their brief
states that their cases were improperly applied by the lower
court in dismissing the class action suit, which is now on
appeal to the 3rd Circuit.

According to Allan Parker, CEO and founder of the Texas
Justice Foundation, the class action lawsuit alleges in part
that neither the state of New Jersey nor abortion providers
adequately protect the health of women and the life of the
unborn child.

In the case of one plaintiff, her parents allegedly forced
her to have an abortion. On top of that, the abortion clinic
allegedly never asked for her consent.

The other two plaintiffs allege that abortion clinics gave
them false or misleading information, not telling them that
the abortion would "take a human life."

"There are other states that ... have allowed you to sue for
the loss of life in the womb," said Parker. "We call that a
denial of equal protection. Some women in some states whose
children are injured while in the womb can recover legally
for damages."

"In this case, in New Jersey, they're not allowed to recover
for injuries to children in the womb," she said.

Abortion law expert Michael Scaperlanda of the University of
Oklahoma College of Law says that whatever the legal merits
of the case, the court of public opinion may be more
important for the time being.

"You're fighting this battle on two fronts: the courts and
public opinion," said Scaperlanda.

"If they can get the courts and or the public, and
preferably both, to see that abortion really is in many
instances coerced - either legally or just persuaded - then
maybe that will turn the tide of public opinion more and
more against abortion," he said.

The court probably will not give weight to the fact that
Norma McCorvey and Sandra Cano have filed amicus briefs,
said Scaperlanda. "But it is a value added, and that is
whether the court pays attention to it and the extent that
the media pays attention."

"Also," Scaperlanda added, "if they can successfully sue
doctors, it raises the cost and makes it more likely doctors
won't want to pursue it."

Abortion foes should pursue a strategy that is very similar
to the strategy employed by civil rights activists that
toppled segregated schools and led to Brown v. Board of
Education, Scaperlanda advised.

"You do it incrementally at first. You go after the things
that all of society is going to agree are the most egregious
things."

** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107,
this material is distributed without profit to those who
have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research and educational purposes. **

Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2001 09:46:27 -0700
From: "SueW" <gswidemark@home.com>
To: "Cinlife_mailing list" <cinlife@cin.org>
Subject: Jane Roe Takes Roe. V. Wade Back To Court

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Teacher Under Fire in Wisconsin for Airing Pro-Life Video

Weston, WI -- A Wisconsin psychology teacher wanted to get his students
thinking about science ethics. Now, school officials want to remove any
hint of Christian ethics from his curriculum.

In January, psych teacher LeRoy Miller showed his class at D.C. Everest
High in Weston, Wis., a 13-minute clip from a pro-life video to help
illustrate questions of scientific ethics. It featured a former
abortion-clinic worker whose voice is electronically disguised:

"We would procure fetal tissue for research," the worker said on the
video. "We would get a generated list each day to tell us what tissue
researchers, pharmaceutical companies, universities were looking for."

Miller subsequently got complaints from the parent of one of the students.

"And the complaint that the parent gave was . . . that I had biased her
daughter against abortion, and her daughter said that after seeing that
video, she probably would not consider having an abortion," Miller said.

Building on that single complaint, school officials are now demanding that
Miller drop the pro-life video, that he submit his entire curriculum for
review, and that he delete any mention of Christian psychologists.

"I want these kids to be able to see that there is a spiritual side of
life and (that) the spiritual side of life affects behavior -- and (that)
there's a lot of psychologists (and) psychiatrists that believe that,"
Miller said.

Jordan Lorence, an attorney with the Northstar Legal Center in Fairfax,
Va., is sending a letter to the school district on behalf of Miller. "The
school district seems to be adopting a very extreme 'search and destroy'
mindset about anything religious in the public school classroom," Lorence
said.

Lorence argued that religious materials can be legally used in public
school if they clearly fit the lesson.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Teacher Under Fire in Wisconsin for Airing Pro-Life Video
Source:   Focus on the Family; April 12, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
OTTAWA ARCHBISHOP BLASTS CATHOLIC HEALTH MINISTER OVER ABORTION

OTTAWA, Jan 19, 2001 (LSN.ca) - Ottawa Archbishop Marcel Gervais soundly
rebuked Catholic Health Minister Allan Rock in an interview with the Ottawa
Citizen published today. The archbishop told the paper that Rock's actions
to promote the funding of abortion "make my blood boil," and urged Catholic
voters to "raise a stink" about the funding of abortion. "The fact that we
do not have a law to protect the rights of the unborn ... should not lead us
to quietly accept abortion as a right, as a medically necessary procedure.
Life is at issue here," Gervais said.

The archbishop lamented that although the Church teaches abortion is evil,
there is not one major political party in Canada that is pro-life, even
though nearly half of all Canadians call themselves Roman Catholic. He
called on Prime Minister Jean Chretien and Rock, both Catholics, to come out
of the closet on the pro-life side of the issue. "Catholic politicians
should be making their private opinions public. Religion is not a private
affair. It is a public issue," he said. Pro-life leaders, while very
praising of the archbishops comments, tend to believe the evidence is
substantial that Chretien, Rock and other prominent Liberal Catholic
politicians are in fact not in the closet on the abortion issue. Steve
Jalsevac
of Campaign Life Coalition notes that "their practical support for abortion
access, funding and promotion nationally and internationally has been
extreme".

The Citizen reports that Archbishop Gervais was stunned that the mainstream
media totally ignored a letter from the Canadian Conference of Catholic
Bishops on the issue, released January 10. (see the LifeSite coverage here
http://lifesite.net/ldn/2001/jan/010111.html#1) He is sending out the letter
to all Ottawa priests to disseminate the information to parishioners.
Archbishop Gervais' statement was given front-page coverage in the Ottawa
Citizen, and has shown that the media remains much more attentive to
familiar local church authorities than to bureaucratic organizations without
a face such as the CCCB

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Former Abortion Employees Seek Peace After Quitting

Washington, DC -- Entering the abortion business was easy, says Joan
Appleton, a former head nurse at the Commonwealth Clinic, an abortion
facility in Falls Church, Va. But leaving it 12 years ago, she says, was
something else.
    
"If I had known in 1989 what I know today," she says, "I would have gone
to the nearest bridge and jumped. The horror of what you've been involved
in doesn't come to you right away."
    
Today Miss Appleton, 53, operates the Centurions, which offers therapy to
people who have left the abortion industry. Its international component,
the Society of Centurions based in Victoria, British Columbia, is having a
conference this week in Copenhagen.
    
Named after the Roman soldier who presided over Christ's crucifixion, the
society was founded 10 years ago by pro-life Canadian psychiatrist Dr.
Philip Ney when he began assembling what he calls "psychological methods"
to help former abortion facility workers.
    
Dr. Ney remembers, "A male gynecologist said to me, 'If you are concerned
about some of these problems, how about helping people like me who used to
[perform] abortions and who gave it up but are having a struggle with the
transition?' "
    
According to the pro-abortion Alan Guttmacher Institute, the number of
abortion facilities has dropped since the early 1980s. From a high of
2,908 in 1982, the number dropped 30 percent to 2,042 in 1996, the most
recent year for which the group has statistics.

Appleton says she is increasingly sought after by nurses, receptionists,
security officers and doctors who wish to leave the abortion business.
Last year, she helped 22 persons, she says, and 60 persons have contacted
her over the past five years.
    
"The doctors get out because they can't get rid of the nightmares," she
says. "But you can't find a clergyman who knows what you're going through.
    
The process is fraught with potential disasters -- such as the black eye
the pro-life movement suffered last year when one of its recent converts,
former abortion practitioner Eric Harrah, a born-again Christian,
renounced his faith and returned to his former lifestyle. In November
1997, Harrah left his State College, Pa., abortion facility and converted
to Christianity with the help of several people from a local Assemblies of
God church. He soon appeared on local TV explaining his conversion.
    
The following summer, he was featured in the National Enquirer as being
sought after by investigators working for former independent counsel
Kenneth W. Starr, who had heard of Monica Lewinsky's 1996 abortion and
Harrah's reputation as "abortionist to the stars."
    
Harrah is a "flamboyant, outspoken individual," says Ron Fitzsimmons of
the National Coalition of Abortion Providers. "A number of people within
our movement knew Eric had personal issues he was dealing with," he says.
"He was someone you couldn't ignore."
    
Meanwhile, Harrah's reputation as a spaker for pro-life causes
skyrocketed.
    
"Eric moved out of the abortion industry, and the next day he was on the
speaking circuit," says Carol Everett, who operated a Dallas abortion
facility before leaving the business in 1983. "But I never trusted him
because he seemed to fabricate his story as he went. Everybody sees
someone who's a new pro-lifer and wants to get that story out as fast as
possible. But we need time to change. You just don't turn 180 degrees and
step into another culture."
    
Appleton says it took her seven years to switch "cultures."
    
"I encountered many pro-life picketers and sidewalk counselors," she says
of her five years at the Falls Church abortion facility. "For the most
part, I hated them all." But one woman, Debra Braun, befriended her.
Appleton followed her friend to Minnesota in early 1991 and attended one
of Dr. Ney's therapy sessions in 1995. She calls it "hell week."
    
"We started at 8 in the morning and finished at 10 at night," she says of
Dr. Ney's therapy. "I was there with a couple other former abortion
providers and together we helped one another give humanity to the unborn
babies we helped kill."
    
"Some make it, some don't," the doctor says. "The ones who don't sort of
implode. They may revert to drinking, trying to struggle with their anger
and guilt, hiding out in a series of rationalizations. They have to deal
with all sorts of problems: guilt, shame, anger. They feel they've been
badly used by their colleagues, doing the dirty work for other doctors.
These people also feel they are doing a job for society -- that other
people are making them do it. They feel used. When we attempted to find
out what got people into the abortion industry, they said it was the power
and the money that attracted them. The power was power over life and
death."
    
Dr. Ney, who is near retirement, has since expanded to a more
international sphere.
    
"I get quite a number of East Bloc ex-abortionists," he says. "As for the
Russians, they are gradually finding a voice and protesting what is
happening to them, telling the state they cannot be expected to do that."
Russian women average 2 and 1/2 to four abortions, according to the World
Health Organization.
    
American women who have left the business say that religious conversions
played a prominent part. Dr. Beverly McMillan, an obstetrician in Jackson,
Miss., who opened up that state's first abortion facility in 1975, says
reading Norman Vincent Peale's "The Power of Positive Thinking" gave her
second thoughts.
    
"I was depressed to the point of suicide, and I think the abortions had
something to do with this," she says. "With the technique I used, we had
to reassemble the parts. It just got too real. It wasn't guilt that got me
out. It was looking at the bodies and realizing five minutes earlier, this
was all together in one beautiful piece."
    
She left the business in 1978 and has since returned to the Catholic
Church, in which she was raised. She also has attended one of Dr. Ney's
workshops.

Everett, the former Dallas abortion facility operator, converted to
Christianity in July 1983, 10 years after she aborted her third child.
"The last month I was at my clinic, I made $13,000," she says, "and that
was considered low. You don't walk out of that and suddenly change."
    
In fact it took 12 years of near-constant counseling to change. She also
named the child she aborted "Heidi." Now living in Austin, she operates
the Heidi Group, a group that helps crisis pregnancy centers with
strategic planning and fund raising.

Appleton calls the child she aborted "Cecilia" and every day draws a
picture "of an unborn child that I helped kill." She gives the baby a name
and a personality, speaks and prays with the child, then "I ask God to
receive this child into His kingdom."
    
Dr. Ney says this is all a part of restoring people's humanity. "If you
dehumanize others, you dehumanize yourself," he says. "If you stop your
ears to the silent pleading of a little life, then you become insensitive
to the prompting of your own heart and mind."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:   Former Abortion Employees Seek Peace After Quitting
Source:   Washington Times; February 23, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Indiana Hospital's Physicians Oppose Proposed Pro-Abortion Policy

Muncie, IN -- A proposal to change Ball Memorial Hospital's abortion
policy was defeated Tuesday night by a vote of the medical staff during a
2-hour, private meeting. The decision ended what the hospital called a
"tumultuous week" in which it fielded more than 500 telephone calls from
people across the country voicing their opinions on the issue.

The hospital currently allows abortions only to protect the life or health
of the pregnant woman. The proposed change would have allowed abortions if
an unborn child was diagnosed with fatal abnormalities.

Sue Errington of the Planned Parenthood office in Muncie on Wednesday
questioned whether pro-life leaders deliberately "stampeded" their troops
into thinking the hospital was considering abortion on demand.

Errington obtained a voice message left on a church's answering machine
indicating opponents of the proposed change either "didn't check their
facts" or intentionally spread misinformation. "It's hard to make a calm,
rational decision when you've got all these callers breathing down your
neck," Errington said. "Hopefully, that didn't have an impact on the
ultimate decision of the doctors."

Only a handful of such cases occur here every couple of years. They
include instances in which a baby is born without the top portion of his
or her brain and cases in which a baby's kidneys don't form normally,
preventing the lungs from developing.

By a margin of roughly 2-1, the hospital's medical staff voted against the
proposed pro-abortion change. More than 150 physicians attended the
meeting, and about 120 were eligible to vote. About 25 of those attending
voiced their opinions during the meeting.

The decision was announced by BMH President Mitch Carson during a
late-night news conference, covered by Indianapolis television stations,
in the hospital's basement.

Asked whether public opinion influenced the decision, Carson said: "We
really tried not to involve that opinion at this time. We certainly were
aware of that opinion. Clearly, if it had gone any further than tonight,
that community opinion would have been very, very important."

If the medical staff had recommended changing the policy, the hospital's
board of directors would have weighed public opinion before making a final
decision.

Carson said many of the more than 500 telephone callers didn't have their
facts straight. Some of the calls came from out of state. "The
right-to-life group has a very good network," Carson said.

Daryl Morrical, chairman of the medical staff's executive committee, said
good points were made on both sides of the issue.

"There were a number of concerns," Morrical said at the press conference.
"One is the sancity of human life and the value of human life, and when
you make the decision that a human life should be terminated, I think the
feeling of the clinical staff is we really don't have that right as
physicians."

An intensive care doctor, Morrical added, "We feel human life is something
to be preserved, not something to be terminated." Another point brought up
by opponents was that abortions are readily available in larger cities
like Indianapolis and Dayton.

As the private meeting of the medical staff broke up, people who spoke on
opposite sides of the issue were observed talking, smiling and shaking
hands, according to Carson and Morrical.

From:The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Indiana Hospital's Physicians Oppose Proposed Pro-Abortion Policy
Source:  Muncie Star Press; January 25, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
The name of the company is Pro-Life Communications -- A long
distance company, but unlike AT&T, Sprint, MCI, etc, who donate
money to Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills, with this
company you won’t have to worry that your money may be helping
to finance the American holocaust.

From: <DFJosephMD@aol.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 3:55 AM
Subject: URGENT

Dear Friends,

This is one of the most important messages, that you’ll ever receive
from me.  At last a company that donates 100% of their profits to
charity.  BUT, what interests me and should interest all pro-lifers,
is that this 100% goes to charities, who are fighting to save the
lives
of God’s precious unborn children.  Yes, their donations are earmarked
entirely for pro-life organizations.  Isn’t that Great?

The name of the company is Pro-Life Communications -- A long
distance company, but unlike AT&T, Sprint, MCI, etc, who donate
money to Planned Parenthood and other abortion mills, with this
company you won’t have to worry that your money may be helping
to finance the American holocaust.

And unlike other Pro-life companies who give 10-20% of their profits
to charities and pro-life groups, Pro-Life communications donate 100%.
Now, you can’t beat that and you can’t beat their price.  They offer
the latest technology and personal customer service at an unheard of
across-the-board rate of 8.9 a minute 24 hours a day, 7 days a week
- no strings.  The founders of the company, Joe Dalton and his wife
Jane, both left lucrative careers, to answer a call from God.

To make a long story short, through thick and thin Joe and Jane
persevered, guided by the Holy Spirit in forming a national long-
distance telephone company and a national filtered Internet provider
that would donate 100% of its net profits to life-affirming
organizations
in giving back to God. They started in January 1999 and since then
have been blessed with over 375 Christian and life-affirming
organizations
nationwide.  Their most recent projections indicate their ministry of
Pro Life Communications will donate $14.8 million dollars to the cause
of the Sanctity of Life over the next three years. Joe affirms that by
2009, they will be donating at the rate of $72 million dollars per
year.
That is stunning to say the least.

In a letter that I just received from Joe, he said, “We are truly a
unique ministry.  We are a national long distance company,
an international long distance company, a national Filtered Internet
company and soon to be a national cellular company that donates
all of it's profits to protect life!  “This will go a long way towards
every pro-lifer's ultimate goal, overturning Roe vs. Wade.”

What more do we need to know -- how easy can it be.  I am going
to dump my long distance provider and sign on with Pro-life
Communications and all you, who ask me, what you can do to help
in the pro-live movement -- NOW, you know and it won’t take much
of your time and you will save money.  But, please keep up and
intensify your every day pro-life work.

The following is their web site.  You can sign up online or by phone.
http://www.prolifecomm.com/index.htm

Please send this message out on all your lists.

Frank Joseph MD
DFjosephMD@aol.com

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Chicago Archdiocese Considering Ban on Pro-Abortion Speakers

Chicago, IL -- An Illinois lawmaker is trying to convince local Roman
Catholic Church officials to enforce a rarely exercised policy that bans
political speakers, including abortion supporters, from speaking on church
property.

In recent weeks, state Sen. Patrick O'Malley, a Roman Catholic and
Republican from the south suburbs of Chicago, has met with the head of the
Catholic Archdiocese of Chicago, Cardinal Francis George, asking him to
implement a ban on pro-abortion speakers on church property.

If enforced, such a policy could have profound implications on politics in
Chicago, a city known in part for the political legacy of the Daley
family, including Mayor Richard M. Daley, who supports abortion.

A parallel situation arose in 1988, when the Bishop of Erie, Penn. enacted
a similar ban, which has kept Gov. Tom Ridge (R-Penn.) from speaking at
Catholic churches there.

"I wanted him [Cardinal George] to consider doing the same thing," said
O'Malley. "He said to me that there already was such a rule."

According to O'Malley, the policy is straightforward. "If you are
pro-abortion you are not permitted to speak on church property on matters
of public policy. I asked him 'Who enforces this?' And he said: `It is the
pastors who are supposed to enforce this.'"

Archdiocese of Chicago spokesman James Dwyer confirmed that the church
does have a policy, which prohibits "anybody from campaigning from the
pulpit." But he said the policy is not directed solely at abortion. "It's
non-partisan," said Dwyer.

But many local churches do not enforce any prohibition, which stems from
the National Conference of Catholic Bishops' 1998 paper, Living the Gospel
of Life: A Challenge to American Catholics.

In reference to abortion, the official church position makes no overtly
political distinctions.

According to the policy, bishops "must therefore explain, persuade,
correct and admonish those in leadership positions who contradict the
Gospel of life through their actions and policies. Catholic public
officials who disregard Church teaching on the inviolability of the human
person indirectly collude in the taking of innocent life".

Word of O'Malley's meeting with the Cardinal is spreading in public policy
circles, with pro-life advocates expressing cautious optimism.

"I'd like to see (the ban) enforced," said Mary Anne Hackett, president of
Catholic Citizens of Illinois. "It is difficult for the Catholic people to
take the ban against abortion seriously when you have pro-abortion
candidates in your parish and there are pro-abortion speakers on your
agenda."

Hackett said that pro-abortion activists have frequently spoken at
Chicago-area Catholic churches in the recent past, including Rev. Jesse
Jackson Jr. and Kweisi Mfume, president of the National Association for
the Advancement of Colored People.

But sometimes, the prohibition has been enforced based on the political
aspects of the abortion debate. During the 2000 election, a local bishop
reportedly prevented pro-life supporters from distributing literature,
constituting what Hackett called a pro-abortion agenda.

Church officials note that some Roman Catholics have stopped attending
mass at local churches in the Archdiocese and have opted for churches that
report directly to the Vatican and in which mass is observed in Latin.

But many other parishioners continue attending their familiar neighborhood
church. "Some of those churches are way too liberal for me," says Jack
Roeser, president of the Family Taxpayers Network, a Chicago area advocacy
group.

Roeser also questioned the application of the prohibition on political
speaking in Catholic churches. "Why do we have speakers who advocate
things that we do not stand for?" asked Roeser.

Whether the Chicago church body better enforces its ban remains to be
seen, but O'Malley is hopeful that a public dialog on the issue will
emerge from his recent chat with the Cardinal.  "I thought I would have an
uphill battle putting (the ban) on the agenda," said O'Malley, who
sponsored legislation recently to change Illinois abortion laws.

"Simply put, the church is being used here by 'aborts'. They, the church,
have to strengthen their hand," said O'Malley. "It is hard to win causes
for them if aborts use the churches as a forum."

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Chicago Archdiocese Considering Ban on Pro-Abortion Speakers
Source:   Cybercast News Service; May 31, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Nebraska Petition Drive Against Fetal Tissue Research Nearing Goal

Omaha, NE -- A petition drive to ban fetal-tissue trafficking in Bellevue,
Nebraska - part of a four-pronged approach by pro-life advocates in
Nebraska - is inching toward its goal.

"We still need more signatures, but I think we are getting close," said
Elizabeth Miller, the Bellevue woman who launched the effort Oct. 5 on
behalf of Metro Right to Life.

Miller declined to disclose the number of signatures gathered, but said
that with the filing deadline two weeks away supporters continue to
circulate the petitions before and after Sunday services at Bellevue
churches.

"We're actively going to the churches," said Miller, who stopped
treatments for multiple sclerosis at University of Nebraska Medical Center
when she learned it was using fetal tissue in research. "This has really
become a community thing."

Bellevue is a key spot for the effort because it is home to LeRoy
Carhart's abortion facility. Until October, when the NU Medical Center
began using fetal brain cells from a Seattle laboratory, the abortion
facility on west Mission Avenue had been the exclusive provider of fetal
tissue to center scientists searching for treatments for Parkinson's
disease, Alzheimer's disease and AIDS-related dementia.

Carhart's Omaha attorney, James Sherrets, said his client believes that
any ban established by the Bellevue petition would have a "questionable
constitutional basis" and he would expect to challenge it.

Bob Blank, president of Metro Right to Life, said that although the
Bellevue drive is moving forward, it may be unnecessary if other
approaches to oust Carhart succeed. "Of course, our focus right now is on
our legislation that's in Lincoln and the revelation that (Omaha City
Councilman) Lormong Lo is going to introduce an ordinance to ban
fetal-tissue research in Omaha," Blank said.

The Judiciary Committee deadlocked Thursday on Legislative Bill 462, which
would ban fetal-tissue research in the state, but Blank said he expects it
will come to the full Legislature for debate. Lo said Tuesday that he
would ask the Omaha City Council to consider a fetal-tissue ordinance next
month.

Blank said Metro Right to Life also is monitoring eviction proceedings
against Carhart, who is involved in lengthy legal appeals with the owner
of the building that houses his abortion facility.

"He could be leaving the area," Blank said. "So, that could make that (the
petitions) a moot point."

If the petitions are successful in Bellevue, however, Carhart would be
prohibited from selling, transferring, distributing or donating fetal
tissue. Violations would be punishable by up to six months in jail and a
$500 fine.

The group has until April 5 to gather signatures of 20 percent of
Bellevue's registered voters. That's 5,243, as of this week. But City
Clerk Beverly Hrdy estimated the petitioners would need more than 6,000
signatures to get the required number, because a portion of any petition
signatures typically are ruled ineligible.

If the drive is successful, Bellevue City Council members would have to
vote on the proposed ban. If they oppose it, petitioners could request
that it be placed before voters at a special election.

From:  The Pro-Life Infonet <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Reply-To:  Steven Ertelt <infonet@prolifeinfo.org>
Subject:  Nebraska Petition Drive Against Fetal Tissue Research Nearing Goal
Source:  Omaha World-Herald; March 26, 2001

*     *     *     *     *     *     *
Shelter for Pregnant Moms Finds Support in Unusual Places
by William McGurn

[Pro-Life Infonet Note:  Mr. McGurn is a member of The Wall Street
Journal's editorial board. To respond to this article, please send an
email to letters@wsj.com. For a list of pregnancy centers that help women,
please visit http://www.pregnancycenters.org]

Ramsey, NJ -- After 1,500 b